I am replicating an 80GB database between NY can CT and would like to
know why table sizes are different between the two.
Here is an example of sp_spaceused::
NY IOI_2007_04_23 rows(279,664) reserved(464,832)
data(439,960) index_size(24,624)
CT IOI_2007_04_23 rows(279,666) reserved(542,232)
data(493,232) index_size(48,784)
Thanks,
MC - 30 Apr 2007 20:11 GMT
I would assume that index is fragmented and the record count is not the same
as far as I can see....
MC
>I am replicating an 80GB database between NY can CT and would like to
> know why table sizes are different between the two.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks,