Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / General / Other SQL Server Topics / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Replicating database btw two sites why aren't the tables identical in size?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
war_wheelan@yahoo.com - 30 Apr 2007 15:43 GMT
I am replicating an 80GB database between NY can CT and would like to
know why table sizes are different between the two.

Here is an example of sp_spaceused::
NY     IOI_2007_04_23  rows(279,664)  reserved(464,832)
data(439,960)  index_size(24,624)
CT     IOI_2007_04_23  rows(279,666)  reserved(542,232)
data(493,232)  index_size(48,784)

Thanks,
MC - 30 Apr 2007 20:11 GMT
I would assume that index is fragmented and the record count is not the same
as far as I can see....

MC

>I am replicating an 80GB database between NY can CT and would like to
> know why table sizes are different between the two.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks,
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.