> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Mike
Do not forget Merge Replication, although I have personally dropped this
from our system because it takes up to much expensive bandwidth on our PDAs.
Does anyone know whether Web Services is more efficent than RDA?
Chris - 11 Jun 2008 01:25 GMT
I am relatively certain RDA/Merge Replication is more efficent than web
services are, simply because standard web services use XML and represent
data textually, replication does not (binary data).
That being said, we moved away from Merge Replication too because we
wanted schema flexibility. We mitigated the performance hit by
implementing compression on the outgoing (and incoming on the client
side) stream. This was done using a SOAP extension class.
Chris
> Do not forget Merge Replication, although I have personally dropped this
> from our system because it takes up to much expensive bandwidth on our PDAs.
> Does anyone know whether Web Services is more efficent than RDA?