Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Clustering / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SQL Server 2005 Cluster Install

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Loren Z - 31 Aug 2006 20:02 GMT
I am doing an SQL Server 2005 Cluster install. The install appeared to go
okay. On the active node everything installed fine. However, when we looked
at the other node only the configuration tools got installed. SQL Server
Management Studio did not get installed. Would anyone know what caused this
and how to install the SQL Server 2005 on a cluser correctly? I understand
that that the management tools only get installed on the primary node.
Should I run setup on the secondary node to install the tools?

I also went through the summary log for the install and  noticed that almost
everything that was installed on the active node was  also installed on the
passive node. The products that did not get installed  on the passive node
were:

- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Integration Services
- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Notification Services
- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services
- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools

Should not these have been installed on the passive node as well?
Arnie Rowland - 31 Aug 2006 20:19 GMT
Hi Loren,

It is usually a good idea to either deliberately 'cross-post', or to NOT
post the same question to several groups. You get better assistance here if
we are able to bounce ideas off of each other.

See the response to your question in microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup.

Signature

Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc

Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous

>I am doing an SQL Server 2005 Cluster install. The install appeared to go
>okay. On the active node everything installed fine. However, when we looked
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Should not these have been installed on the passive node as well?
Loren Z - 31 Aug 2006 22:04 GMT
Thanks for all your help Arnie. I would like to continue the thread in this
group in that my question is more about clusters now then SQL server setup.

As I mentioned the following products get installed on the primary node but
not the secondary node:

- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Integration Services
- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Notification Services
- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services
- Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools

Following your recommendation, we manually installed the SQL Server 2005
Tools on the secondary node. The server is a development server and in the
event of a failover, the above tools would still be needed. Is it possible
to install them on the secondary server or is the cluster striclty for data
redundancy and not application redundancy?

> Hi Loren,
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Should not these have been installed on the passive node as well?
Arnie Rowland - 31 Aug 2006 22:25 GMT
Of course you can install any of the client tools and applications on either
node. The data server is all that fails over. If you are actively using a
client tool or application on a node that fails, your use of the application
does not fail over -it just aborts.

Generally speaking, the client tools are installed on the dba's and/or
developer's desktops and then remotely access the SQL Server cluster. It
takes a fair amount of resources from the cluster node in order to service
desktop applications. SQL Client tools are desktop applications. I would
rather have that memory, CPU time, etc., dedicated to handling the data
server's needs -not the client applications.

And since you are using one of the cluster nodes as a development server,
you will want to make sure that developers do NOT have sa (sysadmin)
privileges in the server.

Signature

Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc

Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous

> Thanks for all your help Arnie. I would like to continue the thread in
> this group in that my question is more about clusters now then SQL server
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>>>
>>> Should not these have been installed on the passive node as well?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.