Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Clustering / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Move 2005 cluster to new hw

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ole Thomsen - 20 Sep 2006 12:04 GMT
I will have to move a 2-node SQL2005 MSCS cluster to new servers.

Wonder if I could just

- remove node1 from cluster
- add node3 to cluster
- remove node2 from cluster
- add node4 to cluster

Is this a valid plan?

Ole Thomsen
Geoff N. Hiten - 20 Sep 2006 13:19 GMT
Yes.  But it is a bit more complex.

Uninstall SQL from Node1.
Evict Node1 from the cluster.
Add Node3 to the cluster
Install SQL to node 3
Test, Test, Test
Uninstall SQL from Node2.
Evict Node2 from the cluster.
Add Node4 to the cluster
Install SQL to Node 4
Test, Test, Test again.

I have done this process using SQL 2000 and it works.  I haven't tested it
with SQL 2005, but the basic steps should not have changed.

Signature

Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP

>I will have to move a 2-node SQL2005 MSCS cluster to new servers.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Ole Thomsen
Ole Thomsen - 20 Sep 2006 19:02 GMT
This is very useful information, thanks.

Ole Thomsen

> Yes.  But it is a bit more complex.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Ole Thomsen
Ole Thomsen - 24 Sep 2006 07:58 GMT
I discovered the hard way that SQL uninstall in 2005 means uninstall BOTH
nodes (just like install is on both) :-)

Otherwise the swap went fine, just a bit more downtime than expected and a
restore of system databases at the end.

Ole Thomsen

> Yes.  But it is a bit more complex.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Ole Thomsen
Linchi Shea - 20 Sep 2006 19:38 GMT
If your disks are on SAN, you can also just create a new and separate
cluster, install SQL Server exactly the same as the old cluster, remove the
shared drives from the old cluster, remove the shared drives from the new
cluster, and present the drives from the old cluster to the new cluster,
making sure the drive letters are assigned the same.

If you can afford the down time during the switch, this gives you an
alternative approach. Another problem of this approach is that you'll end up
with new IP addresses and new network names.

Linchi

> I will have to move a 2-node SQL2005 MSCS cluster to new servers.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Ole Thomsen
Ole Thomsen - 24 Sep 2006 07:54 GMT
Well, the change had to be transparent to users and network, so I chose the
"rolling swap".

Thanks,
Ole Thomsen

> If your disks are on SAN, you can also just create a new and separate
> cluster, install SQL Server exactly the same as the old cluster, remove
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>
>> Ole Thomsen
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.