Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Clustering / July 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Best practice for naming instance

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pasquale - 22 Jul 2008 14:07 GMT
Is it possible to name similarly the virtual server and the SQL instance for
a SQL clustered instance)?
In other terms, is it a best practice to assigne the same name for the
virtual server and for the SQL instance in a cluster?
Could be any problems to use the same names?
Thanks
Linchi Shea - 23 Jul 2008 04:06 GMT
When it comes to naming conventions, I don't think there is any best practice
here.

Yes, you can name your virtual server and your instance name identically.
They are in different name spaces, and so there won't be any conflict. For
instance, if your virtual server name is NYCSQLABC02, you can name the
instance on that virtual server as NYCSQLABC02, and you access that instance
as NYCSQLABC02\NYCSQLABC02. The advantage is that you don't have to remember
which instance goes with which virtual server. The downside is that the
virtual name \ instance name combo can get rather lengthy. We used this
naming convention for a while until we were tired of the long name, and opted
to just use SQL1, SQL2, and so on for the instance name.

Linchi

> Is it possible to name similarly the virtual server and the SQL instance for
> a SQL clustered instance)?
> In other terms, is it a best practice to assigne the same name for the
> virtual server and for the SQL instance in a cluster?
> Could be any problems to use the same names?
> Thanks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.