Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Clustering / August 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

License question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Russ Sparks - 25 Aug 2008 16:04 GMT
In setting up a 2-node cluster (active/active) do I need to have an
additional SQL 2005 Enterprise license for the second node?

Also, I'm new to clustering and I just want to verify that I can do an
active/active 2-node clustering with SQL 2005? I see alot of talk about
active/passive but I'd rather have active/active and was wondering if there's
a limitation or particular reason for active/passive
Geoff N. Hiten - 25 Aug 2008 16:15 GMT
You will need to license any nodes that have an active SQL instance hosted
on them.  If you have a single-instance cluster with two nodes, then one is
always a failover node and does not require a license.  If you have 4 nodes
and three instances, you still have a failover node and only have to license
three instances.

Two nodes with two or more instances require full licensing of both nodes.

Signature

Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP

> In setting up a 2-node cluster (active/active) do I need to have an
> additional SQL 2005 Enterprise license for the second node?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> there's
> a limitation or particular reason for active/passive
Mohit K. Gupta - 28 Aug 2008 17:16 GMT
Since you are setting up active-active, you require two license I belive.  
But thing you have to consider about active-active is if either partner
fails; the remaining partner will take the full load.  So when configuring
hardware for the server make sure it is configured to handle 2x its normal
load.

Thanks.
Signature

Mohit K. Gupta
B.Sc. CS, Minor Japanese
MCTS: SQL Server 2005
http://sqllearnings.blogspot.com/

> In setting up a 2-node cluster (active/active) do I need to have an
> additional SQL 2005 Enterprise license for the second node?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> active/passive but I'd rather have active/active and was wondering if there's
> a limitation or particular reason for active/passive
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.