Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / General / Data Warehousing / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

VLDB nearing 85% space utilization on underlying drives.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gottaknow - 10 Oct 2006 21:32 GMT
I need help tracking down some information regarding SQL Server 2000. I have
a VLDB that is at approixmately 85% space utilization on all of its drives.
Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
susiedba@hotmail.com - 13 Oct 2006 03:29 GMT
yeah just about 80%

how much space you got?
i think that you should stick it on IDE / SATA drives and then use SQL
Server Analysis Services to get the data out.

Anything else is cost prohibitive

-Susie

> I need help tracking down some information regarding SQL Server 2000. I have
> a VLDB that is at approixmately 85% space utilization on all of its drives.
> Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
gottaknow - 13 Oct 2006 13:33 GMT
We are a one terabyte DW which uses BO to retrieve the data for customer
queries.  The use of BO tool is imposed by the customer.  We are currently at
83% disk utilization with about 50 gigs left before we cross 85% utilization.
So far we have not seen any performance degradation.  We are monitoring
currently and will do a baseline test for about 3 days next week.  We are
hoping this gives us a better indication of when we may be getting closer to
hitting the wall.

> yeah just about 80%
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
Tomasz Borawski - 20 Oct 2006 11:54 GMT
There is no relation between percentage of space utilization and database
performance. However there is a relation between how much data are accessed
and database performance.

> We are a one terabyte DW which uses BO to retrieve the data for customer
> queries.  The use of BO tool is imposed by the customer.  We are currently at
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
susiedba@hotmail.com - 21 Oct 2006 00:06 GMT
I disagree with you; I have seen Microsoft knowledge base articles that
claim that you should NEVER go under 15% for both performance and
longevity reasons

-Susie

> There is no relation between percentage of space utilization and database
> performance. However there is a relation between how much data are accessed
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> > > > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > > > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
Tomasz Borawski - 23 Oct 2006 08:40 GMT
Can you send me the link (KB)?

> I disagree with you; I have seen Microsoft knowledge base articles that
> claim that you should NEVER go under 15% for both performance and
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > > > > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > > > > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
dbahooker@hotmail.com - 23 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT
I dont have it but it's fact

I'll look for it.. sorry

-Aaron

> Can you send me the link (KB)?
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> > > > > > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > > > > > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
dbahooker@hotmail.com - 23 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT
I dont have it but it's fact

I'll look for it.. sorry

-Susie

> Can you send me the link (KB)?
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> > > > > > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > > > > > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
dbahooker@hotmail.com - 23 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT
I dont have it but it's fact

I'll look for it.. sorry

-Aaron

> Can you send me the link (KB)?
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> > > > > > Is there a recommended threshold where not enough free space is available for
> > > > > > SQL Server to maintain it's performance levels?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.