I dont quite understand the problem. You have two databases. Now, you can
update records with scripts, ssis ....
MC
this does sound interesting. Most people forward their disperate data
sources into a data warehouse - you are wanting the data source to have a
foreign key into the DW? Why wouldn't you just improve the DW ETL to
include the missing pieces?
>I dont quite understand the problem. You have two databases. Now, you can
>update records with scripts, ssis ....
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Is there a simple way to implement such data flow?
MC - 15 Apr 2008 07:58 GMT
I *think* the point here would be that there is additional data/information
in DW that possibly doesnt exist elsewhere. Then it would make sense to read
it from DW and in som ways get it back to the source system...
But im really guessing here...
MC
> this does sound interesting. Most people forward their disperate data
> sources into a data warehouse - you are wanting the data source to have a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>>
>>> Is there a simple way to implement such data flow?