I think you haven't given nearly enough detail to have an informed opinion.
It depends on many things, design, SLA, reporting requirements, toolset,
detailed hardware configuration, etc. For example, I've seen a 200GB data
warehouse far more resources that what you have defined. How much data is
held is simply a matter of disk space the tough part is response time.
Ray
>I expect a 3 terabyte warehouse would need no less than
> 8 processors
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> d.
d - 09 Feb 2005 03:01 GMT
Ray,
assume you have a good star schema, a clean set of fact tables and proper
indexing. now would you care to guess?
BTW: MS has a case study where they had a 2.7 T. OLAP running side by side a
1.5 T. OLTP db.
guess what? 12 CPUs and a measley 16 Gig memory.
d.
> I think you haven't given nearly enough detail to have an informed opinion.
> It depends on many things, design, SLA, reporting requirements, toolset,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> >
> > d.
Ray - 09 Feb 2005 12:44 GMT
d,
No. Still only a fraction of the information needed to have an informed
opinion. Keep in mind that company's are corted by MS to produce marketing
material called white papers. While not all whitepapers are marketing
material the ones that say "look what we accomplished" are. They can
provide some good insight but it's what they don't mention that is more
interesting.
Ray
> Ray,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>> >
>> > d.