Local means conflicts the first conflict winner will win and its
change will stick no matter what conflicts occur after that, globally
means they are detected globally and the one with the highest priority
will stick.
For example - If a subscriber syncs with the publisher and a column
level conflict occurs, the subscriber will win the conflict (depending
on how you have configured the conflict resolver). Now the next
subscriber syncs. With Local, the subscriber's update (if it causes a
conflict) will loose with local, but win with global if its priority
is higher than the first subscriber who caused the conflict.
> Hi there,
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Regards,
> Rolf
Rolf - 30 Jul 2008 13:40 GMT
Hi Hilary,
thanks for the answer - so there is no other sense in using local or global
except the priority ? If yes this should be sufficient for me while I have
Prio 100 for the central and 75 for all the republishers. If I now choose
10 for each subscribing Laptop the situation should be the same...as I
use the "subscriber always win" conflict resolver.
Regards,
Rolf
> Local means conflicts the first conflict winner will win and its
> change will stick no matter what conflicts occur after that, globally
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> conflict) will loose with local, but win with global if its priority
> is higher than the first subscriber who caused the conflict.