Hello,
There isn't much activity in this newsgroup, so it begs to question if
anyone know the future support of Service Broker.
I know it's supported in SQL 2008, but what about after that? Is it going
to become obsolete in preference of WCF like the http endpoint
functionality?
Thanks,
KH
Jacob Sebastian - 26 Aug 2008 09:14 GMT
Hi Kevin
I have not heard anything that says this will be discontinued in the future.
Since I don't work at MS, I cant assure that this feature will be there in
the future versions too. But I like Service Broker very much and have a few
applications that uses SB heavily. The feeling that I have is that, this
feature will continue to exist in SQL Server.
regards
jacob

Signature
Jacob Sebastian
SQL Server MVP
http://www.sqlserverandxml.com
> Hello,
> There isn't much activity in this newsgroup, so it begs to question if
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> KH
Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] - 26 Aug 2008 14:25 GMT
Usually it takes about two versions to slide something out (a notable
exception to this, of course, was notification services). But I think
service broker is in an entirely different class and am not concerned that
it will be deprecated any time soon. If anybody here knows anything
different, it's not public information, and so they can't answer you here
for the same reason they can't go trumpeting the news to the media outlets.
In other words, if you haven't seen an official announcement, you are not
going to bleed any secrets out of those "in the know." That said, I am
still not worried.
I'm not sure you can judge the popularity, or future, or success of a
feature or product based on newsgroup activity. Sometimes it is true that
lack of discussion means lack of interest or incredible foresight. Other
times it just means, no news is good news, we are using service broker
successfully.
Think about the VB6 newsgroups and forums, which still have plenty of
activity, even though the technology they are using has long been abandoned
by its creator... And like them, if you are using service broker and at some
point it is discontinued, there is still a pretty lengthy shelf life of the
last version it is supported on, and of course you can continue beyond that
shelf life with that version for as long as you are willing to go
unsupported. (Plenty of people continue to use SQL Server 2000, long after
its support lifecycle ended, and the newer versions are arguably better
suited for the long run than 2000 was.) Even if it means keeping an "old"
instance of SQL Server around to handle the service broker stuff, and doing
bleeding edge stuff in a separate instance of a newer version.
I also continue to develop web sites using "classic" ASP, which continues to
be supported. And since I very rarely need vendor support for SQL Server or
Windows, I can always resort to continuing to use the last version of server
that supports ASP, should it ever be deprecated, until the hardware dies.
On 8/25/08 2:32 PM, in article urJslDuBJHA.2264@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl, "Kevin
Horner" <khorner@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> There isn't much activity in this newsgroup, so it begs to question if
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> KH
Kevin Horner - 26 Aug 2008 15:06 GMT
Thanks for the post.
I didn't find any docs on it either way and just want to make sure my SB app
won't hold a client back from upgrading SQL Server. They will most probably
skip the 2008 release and jump to the one after.
KH
> Usually it takes about two versions to slide something out (a notable
> exception to this, of course, was notification services). But I think
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>> Thanks,
>> KH
Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] - 26 Aug 2008 15:14 GMT
Well, you've got at least three years to watch for Service Broker headlines,
then. I wouldn't hold my breath. :-)
On 8/26/08 10:06 AM, in article eYguYT4BJHA.4816@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,
> Thanks for the post.
>
> I didn't find any docs on it either way and just want to make sure my SB app
> won't hold a client back from upgrading SQL Server. They will most probably
> skip the 2008 release and jump to the one after.
Tibor Karaszi - 26 Aug 2008 16:08 GMT
I'm with the others. My guess is that SB is here to stay for a while. And considering that the
engine itself it uses it for various things (DB Mail and Event Notifications for instance) is a good
indication for me...

Signature
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
> Thanks for the post.
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>>> Thanks,
>>> KH
Alan Brewer [MSFT] - 26 Aug 2008 18:51 GMT
Also, some people post in the Service Broker forum rather than the
newsgroup:
http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=91&SiteID=1

Signature
Alan Brewer [MSFT]
SQL Server Documentation Team
Download the latest Books Online update:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Aaron Bertrand [SQL Server MVP] - 26 Aug 2008 21:10 GMT
Sadly, I should not be able to tell the difference. Forum posts should
appear here, and newsgroup posts should appear there. It's too bad
Microsoft has some hidden motivation for keeping the two technologies so
disparate, and going out of their way to avoid creating a coherent back-end
that can service both. I'm just waiting for the next batch of web forums to
come about, completely separate from NNTP and completely separate from all
of the existing web forum groups that have been created. :-(
On 8/26/08 1:51 PM, in article ukyROR6BJHA.4316@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl, "Alan
Brewer [MSFT]" <alanbr@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Also, some people post in the Service Broker forum rather than the
> newsgroup:
> http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=91&SiteID=1
Dan Guzman - 27 Aug 2008 13:41 GMT
> I know it's supported in SQL 2008, but what about after that?
SQL 2008 was just released with SB enhancements so it seems unlikely to me
that a development investment would be made in obsolete technology.
> Is it going to become obsolete in preference of WCF like the http endpoint
> functionality?
There has been talk about a SB WCF channel for some time so someone must
have a vision that these platforms can work together. Of course, technology
changes and evolves so no one really knows what the future brings. I
personally think Service Broker will be around for a while so I have no
qualms about developing new applications using the feature.

Signature
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/dang/
> Hello,
> There isn't much activity in this newsgroup, so it begs to question if
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> KH