Remove the numbers from your noise word lists and then rebuild your
catalogs. Then change the hyphen to HYPEN in your content, i.e. 5-1 becomes
5HYPHEN1, and 10-23 becomes 10HYPEN23. Then when you search on 10-23 change
the search to 10HYPEN23 and if you are displaying your content, correct it
on the fly.

Signature
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> My clients need to be able to search on identification numbers that are
> formatted like '5-1' or '10-23'. In the first instance, I can't do it at
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks for your help
> --John Loveland
mjr111 - 11 Sep 2006 17:02 GMT
Replacing the term 10-23 with 10HYPHEN23 seems a pretty poor wor
around. Especially considering it used to work correctly with SQL20
and windows 2000.
Why have MS changed this, or at least when will they accept it is a bu
with windows 2003 and fix it. It seems it's something to do with the O
and not actually SQL2005.. or some strange combination of both.
The old version worked as you would expect, a term indexed as 14314
could be found by searching for 143-143, or 143143. In other words i
would act as a word 'joiner'. However a term indexed as 21-2100 coul
only be found by searching for that.
In terms of grammer and logic the old way makes more sense, a hyphen i
meant to join two works, not break them.
This change has pretty much made SQL server useless for my entir
ecommerce application as part numbers can have hyphens in so if anyon
has any other suggestions i'd love to hear the
--
mjr11
Hilary Cotter - 11 Sep 2006 19:11 GMT
Microsoft changed the word breaker between versions. I don't know of a way
other than what I have suggested to fix this.

Signature
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> Replacing the term 10-23 with 10HYPHEN23 seems a pretty poor work
> around. Especially considering it used to work correctly with SQL200
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> ecommerce application as part numbers can have hyphens in so if anyone
> has any other suggestions i'd love to hear them