That really depends on the queries you have. Ideally you will have a single
table which you full text index. The queries themselves against the
full-text indexes are processed separately from the queries against the
tables, so it is somewhat asynchronous.
Adding this asynchronous nature to 80 tables means that you do not have a
scalable solution.
HTH

Signature
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance.
teewebco - 09 Nov 2006 19:41 GMT
Thanks for the fast response.
How about doing the queries up front and stuffing the results into a
single field that is searchable?
Is this the preferred method when encountering many tables like me?
> That really depends on the queries you have. Ideally you will have a single
> table which you full text index. The queries themselves against the
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
Hilary Cotter - 09 Nov 2006 20:13 GMT
Sure, this is an option, but then you would have to full-text index this on
the fly. One other option comes to mind, and that is if you are using SQL
2005, you might be able to full-text index an index view which represents
your underlying tables.

Signature
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> Thanks for the fast response.
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
teewebco - 09 Nov 2006 21:31 GMT
Ill take a look at that. Thanks!