Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Full-Text Search / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are Population Schedules required?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
geek-y-guy - 26 Jan 2007 15:30 GMT
Hi All: I have an FT Cat with 3 tables in it that I created 6 months ago.

Each table in the FT Cat has "track changes" set to "automatic"

There's no defined population schedule.

Will this catalog be updated automatically when the data in the tables
changes, or does it require a population schedule to regularly refresh the
FT Catalog?

TIA
Hilary Cotter - 26 Jan 2007 18:14 GMT
It will be updated within seconds - change tracking updates the index near
real time.

Signature

Hilary Cotter

Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html

Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com

> Hi All: I have an FT Cat with 3 tables in it that I created 6 months ago.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> TIA
geek-y-guy - 27 Jan 2007 19:01 GMT
Thanks Hilary!

So, just for my edification, what are population schedules for? For very
large cats & datasets where you would NOT want it automatically updating,
but would want to schedule repopulation say once daily at 3 am?

> It will be updated within seconds - change tracking updates the index near
> real time.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> TIA
Simon Sabin - 27 Jan 2007 20:54 GMT
Hello geek-y-guy,

Historically in SQL 2000, populations could impact querying (errors occurring)
so you may have wanted to do delay the population.

If you have lots of changes you may still want to delay population to avoid
the performance hit of population and querying

Simon Sabin
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons

> Thanks Hilary!
>
> So, just for my edification, what are population schedules for? For
> very large cats & datasets where you would NOT want it automatically
> updating, but would want to schedule repopulation say once daily at 3
> am?
Hilary Cotter - 28 Jan 2007 03:43 GMT
In general you should always use change tracking as it offers best
performance and near real time indexing. If you select manual change
tracking you can update the index during quiet times or in batches to
minimize the impact of locking during indexing.

There are two other indexing options: full-populations and incremental
populations. If the bulk of your data changes in regular patterns you might
want to schedule a full-population. Incremental populations work best when a
smaller portion of your data changes at a time. In this case you could
schedule an incremental population.

As change tracking can lead to some fragmentation you might want to schedule
the reorganization of your catalog.

Signature

Hilary Cotter

Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html

Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com

> Thanks Hilary!
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>>
>>> TIA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.