Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Full-Text Search / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

After restore database, what happy with full-text catelogs?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Chen - 14 Dec 2004 17:31 GMT
Hi,

I have CRM database that contains full-text catalogs. Someone delete rows by
mistake. I need restore this database to same server from last night backup,
after database restore, do I need manually active full-text indexes or it
will automatically enable since I restore database at same server?

If I need do manually active full-text indexes, where and what kind steps I
need perform?

Regards,
Chen
Hilary Cotter - 14 Dec 2004 17:35 GMT
You should run an incremental population.

Signature

Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
Now available for purchase at:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Regards,
> Chen
John Kane - 15 Dec 2004 02:40 GMT
Chen,
I would recommend that you run a Full Population as the restored database,
may not be current with your existing database in addition to the rows that
were deleted.

Also, if your table does not have a timestamp column and you start an
Incremental Population, then in fact a Full Population is executed and
furthermore, an Incremental Population often takes as long to run as a Full
Population as it needs to determine if any rows are deleted and this causes
the Incremental Population to take as long as the Full Population, even if
no changes have occurred.

Finally, depending upon your SQL Server version ( SELECT @@version ) and if
you are using SQL Server 2000, you can use "Change Tracking" with "Update
Index in Background" and once your database is restored, you may never have
to run an Incremental Population again!

Thanks,
John

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Regards,
> Chen
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.