arrghh...
thanks for the info Geoff,
is it just me...this seems like a big limitation in the whole high
availabilty idea.
do you happen to know the reason for this not being a standard fearture in a
cluster?
> It is possible under very specific circumstances on Windows 2003 to expand
> cluster disks. It depends on how your SAN vendor presents expanded LUNS to
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> >
> > is there a way to add disk to the cluster without taking an outage?
Geoff N. Hiten - 27 May 2005 15:00 GMT
It has to do with the whole clustering architecture. The dependency list is
how the cluster knows how to failover and recover when a resource goes
offline. Clustering is a good tool for handling unplanned outages. You
still have to do some planned maintenance which will cause unavoidable
downtime even with a cluster.
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> arrghh...
> thanks for the info Geoff,
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>> >
>> > is there a way to add disk to the cluster without taking an outage?
Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\) - 27 May 2005 23:22 GMT
Hi
We are using EMC's and Veritas Volume Manager for the disks. We can add and
remove LUNS dynamically on our clusters. It all depends on how much money
and engineering effort you spend on the equipment.
Regards
--------------------------------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> arrghh...
> thanks for the info Geoff,
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>> >
>> > is there a way to add disk to the cluster without taking an outage?