Last week, we had an auditor came in to audit our SQL Server security
settings. He specifically checks if we set developers as sysadmin server
role on our development servers. Our data on dev servers are scrambled,
including name, phone, ssn, bank account numbers, addresses etc.
Can anyone give me the reasons that why do we not want developers as
sysadmin server role on a development server?
Thanks,
Lijun
Paul Ibison - 04 Mar 2008 21:30 GMT
Firstly I'd be interested in how the data is encrypted and if it could be
easily decrypted by having total rights to the instance - ie are the
decryption routines held in the instance? If the developers wrote the
encryption routines outside of SQL Server and you have access to this code
then this is a bit academic anyway :)
Next I'd look at how you could interact with the rest of your network.
Access to xp_cmdshell and sp_OA.... procedures could be a problem if run in
the context of a domain admin, which is the login used on a lot of SQL
installations I've seen. Finally I'd look at any linked servers that are set
up - total access to these could be an issue - just depends which systems
they are pointing at.
Cheers,
Paul Ibison
David Portas - 04 Mar 2008 21:45 GMT
> Last week, we had an auditor came in to audit our SQL Server security
> settings. He specifically checks if we set developers as sysadmin server
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Lijun
Depends how your developers work. If they use their own logins to do unit
tests on the dev server then those logins ought to be given only the roles
they have in production. If they have separate logins for testing then maybe
that's not a problem.
I'm a little sceptical about what you mean by "scrambling" sensitive data
though.

Signature
David Portas