Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / DB Engine / SQL Server / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

double-take for high availability?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gigel - 06 Mar 2008 17:14 GMT
has anyone used double-take for high availability solution?

i am interested in product short comings and pitfalls when used in
conjunction with sql server.

thanks, gigel
Kevin3NF - 06 Mar 2008 18:25 GMT
No Microsoft support....big short-coming.

But I have seen the demos and heard good things about it from the SBS crowd.

:)

Signature

Kevin3NF
SQL Server dude

You want fries with that?
http://kevin3nf.blogspot.com/

I only check the newsgroups during work hours, M-F.
Hit my blog and the contact links if necessary...I may be available.

> has anyone used double-take for high availability solution?
>
> i am interested in product short comings and pitfalls when used in
> conjunction with sql server.
>
> thanks, gigel
Joe - 06 Mar 2008 18:41 GMT
Make sure you understand Service Principle Names (SPNs) and how to set them
manually.
In addition granting the right to set SPNs to the service account running
SQL server.
In some landscapes this AD level permission is not allowed to be set.
Finally if all you are going to do is log ship with it use log shipping.
Joe

> has anyone used double-take for high availability solution?
>
> i am interested in product short comings and pitfalls when used in
> conjunction with sql server.
>
> thanks, gigel
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.