Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / DB Engine / SQL Server / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

running profile trace from query analyzer vs profiler - a performance benefit?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joe - 20 Mar 2008 02:12 GMT
Is there any benefit to running a trace from ssms vs running out from the
profiler?  I assume there is a big one because the gui does not need to be
updated and listbox is not all that efficient and what not.  Thank you.
John Bell - 20 Mar 2008 09:16 GMT
Hi

Running a trace from QA or SSMS will start a server side trace and you won't
have the overhead of the GUI and TEMP disc space profiler uses. This can be
significant especially if you run Profiler on the server itself (which is not
advisable). For instance, if your TEMP directory is on the system disc then
you system may grind to a halt if the disc fills up.

If you run a server side trace make sure that the output file is being
written to a disc that is not going to affect the database I/O ie. on a
different spindle/controller.
Once you have the trace output it can be copied onto a different machine and
analysed.

John

> Is there any benefit to running a trace from ssms vs running out from the
> profiler?  I assume there is a big one because the gui does not need to be
> updated and listbox is not all that efficient and what not.  Thank you.
Joe - 20 Mar 2008 13:59 GMT
Wow thanks!
> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> be
>> updated and listbox is not all that efficient and what not.  Thank you.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.