Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / DB Engine / SQL Server / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Recovering from resource problems

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Chris Wood - 26 Mar 2008 15:22 GMT
Hi,

Yesterday we had some 701 resource messages on one of our production
servers. This was followed by a number of Downgrading backup log buffers
from 1024K to 64K messages in our backup jobs. This is an SQL2005 build 3159
server on W2K3 SP2. We had similar problems last year with an SQL2000 server
and we found that a reboot or stop/start SQL appeared the only way to stop
the problem. We did this last night on this server.

Is this the best way on SQL2005 or will it recover from its resource
problems without a reboot or stop/start SQL?

Thanks

Chris
Jason Massie - 26 Mar 2008 16:10 GMT
It is hard to say if this would address the specific problem but this is
about as close as you can get w/o a restart:
dbcc dropcleanbuffers
DBCC FREESYSTEMCACHE  ( 'ALL' ) WITH  MARK_IN_USE_FOR_REMOVAL
exec sp_msforeachdb 'alter ? set single_user with rollback immediate'
exec sp_msforeachdb 'alter ? set multi_user with rollback immediate'

Be careful. I'd use this like a hail mary with 2 seconds left.

Signature

Jason Massie
Web: http://statisticsio.com
RSS: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Chris
Chris Wood - 26 Mar 2008 18:17 GMT
That is pretty harsh!!! I was hoping that SQL2005 was more robust than
SQL2000.

Thanks

Chris

> It is hard to say if this would address the specific problem but this is
> about as close as you can get w/o a restart:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>
>> Chris
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.