Eric,
Thanks for the reply.
I don't think any code changes at the T-SQL level will help.
these ASSERTs are inside the guts of the SQL Database-Engine.
I looks like an internal SQL-Server bug to me.
now these ASSERTs themselves may only be reporting an
internal data inconsistency, and the real problem began somewhere else
in the internals. But I was hoping that Microsoft had seen this problem
before,
and could help resolve it, behaps with a QFE

Signature
Whit Gregg
Lek Securities Corp
New York, NY
> Sounds like you may be starting a new transaction when one is already
> outstanding on the same process. If that's the case, then using this
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -Eric Isaacs
TheSQLGuru - 03 Jul 2008 22:22 GMT
If you open up a support request with MS and the issue is found to be a bug
I don't think they charge you for the support call. If it is a bug and it
isn't known, others could benefit from your pursuing this one with them.

Signature
Kevin G. Boles
Indicium Resources, Inc.
SQL Server MVP
kgboles a earthlink dt net
> Eric,
> Thanks for the reply.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> -Eric Isaacs
Linchi Shea - 03 Jul 2008 22:27 GMT
If it's critical, I'd open a support case. It's a SQL bug, and you wouldn't
be charged for teh case.
Linchi
> Eric,
> Thanks for the reply.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> > -Eric Isaacs
JXStern - 04 Jul 2008 00:04 GMT
>Eric,
>Thanks for the reply.
>I don't think any code changes at the T-SQL level will help.
While I agree that this looks like an internal SQL bug, changing your
code might just work around it, even if you've done nothing wrong.
I assume this is repeatable. What is your code doing at that point?
J.
>these ASSERTs are inside the guts of the SQL Database-Engine.
>I looks like an internal SQL-Server bug to me.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>before,
>and could help resolve it, behaps with a QFE