Is it a good practice separate master.mdf and master_log.ldf in different
drives?
If yes, how?
Thanks,
Felipe
Linchi Shea - 07 Jul 2008 20:33 GMT
There is really no spceicially good reason for separating the master mdf file
and master ldf file to different drives. There aren't many changes on the
master database, and you can't use its log for point in time recovery anyway.
It's simpler to just put them in the same place.
Linchi
> Is it a good practice separate master.mdf and master_log.ldf in different
> drives?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Felipe
Carlos Felipe França da Fonseca - 07 Jul 2008 22:25 GMT
Make sense.
Thanks Lichi!
> There is really no spceicially good reason for separating the master mdf
> file
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>> Felipe
Carlos Felipe França da Fonseca - 08 Jul 2008 02:57 GMT
Is there any system database that needs to have MDF and LDF in different
drives to improve performance, such as Tempdb?
Thanks,
Felipe
> Make sense.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>>
>>> Felipe
bass_player - 08 Jul 2008 06:40 GMT
TEMPDB files should be in different drives as recommended
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/workingwithtempdb.mspx
> Is there any system database that needs to have MDF and LDF in different
> drives to improve performance, such as Tempdb?
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Felipe
schal - 08 Jul 2008 03:05 GMT
On Jul 7, 1:43 pm, "Carlos Felipe França da Fonseca"
<carlosfelipefra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it a good practice separate master.mdf and master_log.ldf in different
> drives?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Felipe
read this article. it provides guide lines to move user db's and sys
db's .
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/224071
This article has some scripts that might prove to be helpful
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Administration/2605/
note: u might need a login for sqlservercentral.com