| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Clustering SQL and service packs | 30 Sep 2004 17:20 GMT | 4 |
I have a SQL 2000 cluster and have applied SP3 to it. However, when running on one side of the cluster SQL reports a different version to when it is running on the other side. Is this normal / expected or has it not applied SP3 to the other node correctly?
|
| Instance name already exists | 30 Sep 2004 15:33 GMT | 2 |
Hello all... Win2k3 enterprise SQL 2000 2 nodes
|
| Can a clustered SQL 2000 installation run without DNS | 30 Sep 2004 11:55 GMT | 7 |
A client of ours wants to run a clustered instance of SQL and not have it dependent on name resolution for anything. Since it appears that SQL is heavily dependent on AD and DNS for the virtual server piece, does this dependancy constitute a single point of failure?
|
| Cluster Crash when pull both cable out | 30 Sep 2004 04:47 GMT | 2 |
I have setup a production sql server cluster, as ususall I setup MSCS first and do the failover test. I use dual fiber channel card for redundancy, but I meet prob:
|
| I CANT INSTAL a Virtual Server of SQL 2000 Enterprise in Win2k3 Enterprise | 30 Sep 2004 03:14 GMT | 13 |
I have a Cluster of Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition, When I try to install a SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition the setup option of Virtual Server appear unavailable I only choose between Local Install or Remote. Thanks for your help
|
| SP3 and Windows 2003 Cluster | 30 Sep 2004 02:51 GMT | 2 |
Question, can SQL Server 2000 SP3 (not SP3A) be applied to a windows 2003 cluster? I tried this recently (two times) and received "the required operations did not complete". However, the sqlsp logs state that the
|
| clustering differences windows 2003 | 30 Sep 2004 02:43 GMT | 2 |
I found several great step by step articles on clustering in windows 2000. What do I need to change in order to work with windows 2003? I read the previous posts and it seems the setup is almost identical. Thanks for your help
|
| Problem installing sql2k Cluster on Win2k3 server | 30 Sep 2004 02:41 GMT | 2 |
I cannot install SQL 2000 on a win2k3 cluster, I get the error: Setup Failed to Perform Required Operations on the Cluster Nodes. Here is the SQLSTP.log file:
|
| Cluster not responding | 28 Sep 2004 23:51 GMT | 4 |
We have been having a problem where the cluster controller does not get a response from the SQL Server from the "are you alive" request ( select @@SERVERNAME ). It seems that the SQL server does not respond within a couple of minutes
|
| Server Cluster - SQL Server Connection problem | 27 Sep 2004 00:11 GMT | 1 |
we are having following Servers: 1) Webserver 2) Application Server 3) DataBase Server
|
| SQL 2000 on Win2k3 Unable to Install | 24 Sep 2004 03:41 GMT | 8 |
Setup Failed to Perform Required Operations on the Cluster Nodes I try to setting up a cluster on two Dell with EMC SAN drives with no success. I have tried everything it's a nightmare. Logfile:
|
| Problem With Cluster !!!! | 24 Sep 2004 02:05 GMT | 3 |
Hello to everyone I have two dell Poweredge 2650 units and a 6 Shared Hard drives with format RAID -5 . The two units are clustered together via windows clustering services. Software called PowerSun on each machines along with the cluster
|
| Dtabases over multiple instances | 23 Sep 2004 21:03 GMT | 3 |
For performance reason, I want to devide all databases over multiple instances. Say 3 instances in a 4-node cluster(win2K3).Active/Active/Active/Passive In this case, the application would need to know on which
|
| 64 and a 32 bit box SQL2000 - How to make poor mans cluster | 23 Sep 2004 20:43 GMT | 3 |
I´ve got a 64 and a 32 bit box sqlsrv 2000 - 2 locations 60 m apart How do I disaster secure the master(64 bit) sqlserver by replication - can you do that with 32 bit and 64
|
| Clustering two MS SQL 2000 serveres | 23 Sep 2004 15:48 GMT | 2 |
I need to make an active/active cluster out of two servers. One of them is critical and has huge number of published tables, so I want it to be available the sooner the better. What is the best way to do this?
|