| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| multiple instance cluster diagram | 31 Jan 2005 00:11 GMT | 2 |
Does anyone have a good diagram? I have seen for single instance cluster at microsoft site. Thanks
|
| Unable to connect through routed network | 29 Jan 2005 01:35 GMT | 1 |
Hello everyone... I'm trying to setup publishing on my 2 SQL servers for backup purposes. Main SQL server - (win2k)2 node clustered sql server with ip address of 192.168.0.245
|
| Failover with Replication | 28 Jan 2005 17:59 GMT | 2 |
I am not sure how to approach this problem. What I need to do is setup failover as well as data copying. I need to setup clustering on two nodes. If one node goes down then the other node should pick up the load. But the problem is that you need to have a shared SAN. Is ...
|
| Can a virtual server have local Windows users and groups? | 27 Jan 2005 22:37 GMT | 1 |
I have a scenario which works fine on a non-clustered SQL server, and I now want to implement it on a clustered SQL server. In a stand-alone, non-clustered environment: - I have local Windows security groups on the machine; call the groups
|
| Cluster SQL Active-Active | 27 Jan 2005 01:23 GMT | 3 |
My friends: I need document information about the installation process of SQL in Cluster with two instances, both active, one in each Server. In summary I want to install a Cluster of SQL Active-Active, for take greater benefit of both
|
| distributed transaction on win 2003 server failed | 26 Jan 2005 16:32 GMT | 1 |
I AM USING DISTRIBUTED TRANSACTION WITH sql server 2000 on win2k working fine. but the same transaction not working in win2k3. i am getting the following error.
|
| Installing A Failover Cluster | 26 Jan 2005 15:53 GMT | 5 |
I have two matched servers, one will be Active and one will be Passive. The servers have Windows 2000 Advanced Server and I have SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition. My question is, do I also need a box called a Shared Disk Array, or can I
|
| Windows Server 2003 Storport Action / Experiences ? | 25 Jan 2005 20:13 GMT | 5 |
Looking to do a Windows Server 2003 build for Exchange \ SQL Server and been researching about the new Storport driver model as per link below. All sounds good, seems the best way to go but wondering if anyone here has real world experiences to share ? Number one concern is ...
|
| Clustering Service not starting right away on One Node | 25 Jan 2005 17:52 GMT | 6 |
I just set up a cluster attached to a SAN. I have had it where the cluster service on one of the nodes doesn't start up right away. I have checked the services to make sure that it is set to automatic which it is. Both nodes are current with the latest patches and security ...
|
| 2003 & SQL 2000 clustering Memory | 25 Jan 2005 16:35 GMT | 13 |
Whats the recommendation for memory configuration on a single instance SQL2000 cluster running on Windows 2003. Each node has 8GB RAM. Do I still have to use the /PAE switch in Boot.ini to allow the OS to see
|
| Best practice for SQL cluster and domains | 25 Jan 2005 13:59 GMT | 2 |
We have a critical 24x7 SQL cluster (W2K), which is a member of an NT 4 domain. As hardware is getting old, and NT4 domain is going to disappear in the near future, the cluster has to be re-newed. There is also a trusted Active Directory domain, which holds about all user accounts ...
|
| Change Domains | 24 Jan 2005 23:50 GMT | 3 |
I need to move a Win2k/SQL2k 2-node cluster to another Domain. I'm considering two alternatives: (a) a node by node rebuild to a Win2k3/SQL2k cluster in the new Domain, and (b) migrating MSCS to the new domain per kb26196: "How to Move a Windows Cluster Server from one domain to ...
|
| BPool::Map: no remappable address found | 24 Jan 2005 22:10 GMT | 1 |
We received the error listed below last month on our SQL Server 2000 cluster server with Windows 2003 server. Please help me resolve this error. Thanks,
|
| Veritas storage foundation HA for windows | 24 Jan 2005 21:14 GMT | 5 |
We have been looking at Stratus and Marathon Technologies for High Availability solutions for SQL Server. Zero time is a requirement as well as not having to make our application "cluster-aware". Microsoft Clustering requires application modifications and almost 2 minutes of ...
|
| Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster | 24 Jan 2005 12:09 GMT | 14 |
Here is my situation: I have stand alone sql server 2000 and with 2 databases. Unfortunately that server, which was supposed to be able to handle the workload of both database and database apps, is not able to do so. So I am looking into
|