| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Main requirements per A-A model | 19 Jul 2005 08:28 GMT | 3 |
I would like to build an Active-Active model with two nodes (Win200 AdServer) question is easy: which are the most important parameters as well as little things that then are so important when everything is running in production? Same memory for both?
|
| Troubleshooting using the passive server | 18 Jul 2005 17:21 GMT | 4 |
I already feel as if I know the answer to this question but I want to confirm my thoughts before moving forward. We have a clustered default SQL instance running W2K3 Enterprise and SQL2000. We were having a problem last week that we could not solve via SQL. We decided to ...
|
| Clustering with sql and third party database softwares | 17 Jul 2005 19:42 GMT | 1 |
I have a clustered enviroment made of 2 win2k advanced servers clustered in a network. Servers are running sql 2000 that hosts a third party database X. Now X was working perfectly until these servers were clustered. Users accessed X via a citrix client. Any idea as to why
|
| Unistall and reinstall sql 2000 64 bit over Windows 2003 Itanium | 17 Jul 2005 17:18 GMT | 1 |
After serious storage problems, I need to uninstall a cluster sql 2000 64 bit over a two windows 2003 servers 64 bit Itanium Dell PowerEdge 7250, attached a storage HP XP 1024, and after reconfigure the SQL Server failover cluster. I known, it's a big task, do you have some
|
| Help with disk array | 13 Jul 2005 20:08 GMT | 1 |
After I installed new 4 new disks in the SAN and added them as resources in clusteradministrator im not able to see them when I try to expand the filegroup. I can see the disk in "My Computer", but not in the SQLServer, is there something extra there should be done to enable the ...
|
| Active /Pasive vs Active/Active | 13 Jul 2005 17:12 GMT | 1 |
we have 2 node Active/pasive cluster system, and thinking to convert it to active/active. In order to determine all pros/Cons I'm trying to find out all comparison issues. Any article,comment on this, will be appreciated.
|
| AWE on 4GB multi-instance box? | 13 Jul 2005 13:38 GMT | 1 |
We have a SQL server 2000 cluster, built on Windows 2000 Advanced server. We are using an Active / Passive configuration which has 4 instances of SQL Enterprise, and 1 Instance of IIS. Both boxes are identical, and clustering works just fine.
|
| Memory configuration for Win2k3 and SQL2k | 13 Jul 2005 03:10 GMT | 2 |
I've built a single-instance Win2k3sp1 based cluster and installed SQL2ksp3 on it. The servers are symmetrical and have 8GB RAM ea. Currently, I plan to enable /3GB switche in boot.ini, and will also enable /PAE and AWE. I left the pagefile (about 11GB in size) on the c:\ ...
|
| sql memory | 12 Jul 2005 19:25 GMT | 1 |
i have a microsoft sql 2000 server sp2 (on purpose because of erp, jde edwards) set up on a windows 2000 server cluster (advanced server - 2 nodes), with 4 gb of ram i have already included the /3gb switch in the boot.ini file. 'awe enabled'
|
| EVA defragmentation. | 11 Jul 2005 22:14 GMT | 6 |
We have a HP EVA 5000. SQL 2000 Cluster is using 150 GB(Drive R:) on the EVA for all database files. I want to defragment Drive R:. Fýrst I intend to stop SQL Server and SQL Server Agent,then backup up all system and user databases to Tape Backup(.mdf and .ldf files) ...
|
| question about drives configuration | 11 Jul 2005 14:43 GMT | 5 |
We will build new clustering SQL Server. The question is that what kind drives configuration for user-defined database data files and transaction log files will improve performance, RAID 1+0, RAID 0+1, RAID 5 or RAID 10 etc. Regards!
|
| Installing Hot Fix as Outlined in KB899761 on a Two-Node Cluster | 09 Jul 2005 22:14 GMT | 4 |
The KB article, 899761, is silent regarding applying this hotfix to a two-node cluster. Please guide me in how this should be accomplished or provide me with a reference on this subject. Thank you.
|
| Requirements for non-administrative service account for clustered SQL 2000 | 08 Jul 2005 15:50 GMT | 3 |
I understand from Microsoft that a SQL Server 2000 Cluster on Windows 2003 Enterprise can be run with a non-administrative service account but I have not been able to get this to work- the SQL installation fails with "This operation returned because the timeout period expired"
|
| CmdExec and Environment | 07 Jul 2005 15:06 GMT | 2 |
Unfortunately several of my sql users need tot run cmdexe jobs (dts-packages). To keep them from totally destroying my server I configured a proxy account with not to much rights on the files system. For each virtual server I created a separate temp dir for the proxy user.
|
| 90 Databases on cluster (Active/Passive) | 06 Jul 2005 18:47 GMT | 1 |
hello, I am going to install SQL Server 2000 on Windows2003 server with (Active/Passive) configuration I have db space as 600 gig , ranges 1 gb to 90 gb. i have one concern about how log failover to passive server will take in case of it need? whether it
|