| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| SQL Server 2005 side-by-side on cluster with SQL Server 2000 | 01 Oct 2005 22:39 GMT | 3 |
We are using an Active-Passive cluster environment in our project. So far, we made use of only one instance of SQL Server. i.e SQL Server 2000. New architectural change is introduced in the current version of the project. We will have two instances of Database server. One is of ...
|
| patching a windows server 2003 cluster | 01 Oct 2005 22:31 GMT | 4 |
I have an active-active SQL 2000 Cluster running on Server 2003. Both nodes have a vanilla 2003 OS on them. I tried upgrading each nodes to a new custom build (hotfixes, security templates, etc) and it broke both nodes after I patched the first one. Any suggestions?
|
| Migrating SQL Cluster to new SAN | 01 Oct 2005 22:20 GMT | 1 |
I have a 2-node Active/Passive SQL cluster. It has 4 clustered drives (F: G: H: and Q:). All drives are on a SAN. I need to move all this data onto a new SAN, and then get the cluster to look at the new clustered drives as opposed to the old ones. This will also
|
| 2 node Active/Active with 2 separate storage servers all in 1. | 01 Oct 2005 22:08 GMT | 4 |
We have a pair of identical IBM 445s and would like to run them in an active/active cluster. We have a new IBM TotalStorage DS8100 and an older IBM TotalStorage Enterprise Storage Server Model 800 that along with the servers, are a small part of our SAN. We run Emulex & Qlogic ...
|
| upgrading cluster hardware | 01 Oct 2005 21:44 GMT | 4 |
Hi group, We have a two node windows 2000 sp4 cluster running SQL 2000 SP3 in active/active mode. We just want to upgrade the hardware now, what is the easiest way? Can you
|
| Error moving sql server resources | 01 Oct 2005 16:49 GMT | 1 |
I am having a problem when I try to move resource (sql server service) from one group to another. Moving other resources works fine but not SQL. I have two SQL server s 2000 sp3a on two win 2003 servers on an active/passive mode.
|