| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Mirroring in SQL2005 not supported bij Microsoft? | 25 Apr 2006 12:34 GMT | 1 |
We're planning to implement mirroring with SQL-Server 2005. On: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/dbmirror.mspx Microsoft advises againts using this technology in production situations. What are my alternatives?
|
| Additional SQL Name on SQL Cluster | 24 Apr 2006 19:52 GMT | 1 |
Is there anyway to add an additional netbios name to a SQL Cluster? I am trying to consolidate some of our older SQL servers onto a pair of SQL Cluster servers, and am not able to risk losing the old SQL names due to some hard coding and the basic size of the network we are on. I
|
| Move cluster to x64 | 24 Apr 2006 19:41 GMT | 1 |
Just been gotcha'd by the problem of adding x64 nodes to an x32 cluster... Has anyone seen the steps to move all the resources and the Virtualserver to a new x64 cluster (resources are SQL2000+SP4). Is it as straightforward as it sounds?
|
| New to Clustoring/Failover Questions | 24 Apr 2006 18:47 GMT | 3 |
Simply put we have a Single SQL 2005 server running our applications. This server runs great, low load, databases under 200 meg mostly, maybe 2 gig of total data. We do backup via NetVault to tape everynight.
|
| Lost connection with SQL Server | 24 Apr 2006 15:40 GMT | 1 |
Current topology - Sql Server 2000 on Windows 2003 Cluster The Client access to the database started to degrade on a particular database, when we tried to access the SQL Enterprise Manager - it result in
|
| SQL 2000 Cluster recovery after ethernet switch outage | 24 Apr 2006 14:24 GMT | 2 |
I have a two-node SQL Server 2000 cluster. Each node has two network interfaces - one interface on each is connected to its opposite number by a crossover cable, and the other interface is connected to an gigabit ethernet switch, to talk to the outside world. All standard stuff ...
|
| Hardware Match | 24 Apr 2006 13:57 GMT | 4 |
Our company has a HP Proliant DL380 and we need another server to establish a clustered environment. Should we but exactly the same server with the same hardware configuration or if the new server is listed in HCL will be enough? Thanks in advance,
|
| How do I add a network connection to an existing Win2K3 cluster? | 24 Apr 2006 04:38 GMT | 3 |
I have a Windows 2003 cluster already built. For some reason, the secondary NIC for the private (heartbeat) network connection did not get added to the cluster. I am trying to figure out how to add it in. It is not a cluster resource, so I cannot add it that way. Does anyone have ...
|
| Shared Database (Active/Active Clustering) | 24 Apr 2006 03:22 GMT | 1 |
Is it possible to have a database (on SAN) that two active nodes of clustering environment work on it simultaneously? Thanks in advance, Leila
|
| Public and Private Network | 21 Apr 2006 21:36 GMT | 2 |
I have problem in understanding term "Public Network" and "Private Network". I need some clarification. For example in this sentence: "Disable NetBIOS for all private network cards before beginning SQL Server Setup"
|
| SQL 2005 Active/Active Cluster don't listenig to 1433 | 21 Apr 2006 20:00 GMT | 4 |
I have set up a new sql 2005 Cluster on a w2k3 box. Now I want to have a Actve Avtive configuration for my cluster boxes. If I try to do this with the config tool I want to set up both nodes to lisenig at the tcp port 1433. If I config it like this the sql server
|
| SQL 2000 + W2K Upgrade | 21 Apr 2006 19:19 GMT | 3 |
I have an HP Proliant DL380 clustered server running SQL2000 and W2K with a mirrored array. I need to reconfigure the array to change the relative sizes of data drives; backup drives; quorum drives, etc. AND upgrade to W2003R2 and SQL 2005. Any suggestions on the order of how ...
|
| security for row level but not based on Database user's login | 21 Apr 2006 13:42 GMT | 1 |
I need to set security for row level but not based on Database user's login. It should be based on the user table login. For the particular user I need to allow only the particular records to access insert, update delete and select.
|
| Hardware Compatibility | 21 Apr 2006 08:30 GMT | 4 |
I read this in documents: "If the solution does not appear on the HCL, the cluster configuration is not supported." What does "is not supported" mean exactly? Does it mean that virtual server
|
| Changing SQL Virtual Network name | 20 Apr 2006 21:16 GMT | 1 |
Since I'm in the process of decommissioning my production SQL 2000 server and bring up a clustered two node system (Windows 2003 R2, SQL 2005), I would like to preserve the instance (it was default) name on the old production server and use it in the new cluster. Right now, the ...
|