| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Cluster question | 31 Oct 2006 20:23 GMT | 5 |
My employer is asking to do an Active / Active SQL 2000 cluster to utilize both servers. Problem is, I don't think SQL 2000 supports an Active/Active solution because both would need access to the disk which isn't possible... The only time an Active / Active cluster can work is ...
|
| Installing a cluster on an existing instance of SQL 2000 SP3A | 31 Oct 2006 20:12 GMT | 2 |
I have been "tapped" to install a passive node on an instance of SQL that is not currently configured for clustering on a W2003. Can I simply install clustering services on the current production instance, then install a new instance on what would be the passive node? Then add
|
| SQl Server fails to start on 1 node | 31 Oct 2006 15:19 GMT | 2 |
Install worked fine, installed sp4 but when I go to fail from one node to the other it fails to start on the second node. All shared storage, IP's failover correctly, node service accounts are the same, second node can connect to the instance by name when it is started on the
|
| SP1 only installs on the Active Node | 31 Oct 2006 15:05 GMT | 2 |
I have a Win2003, SQL 2005 active/passive cluster. We did a fresh install of the OS and SQL. The install of SQL seemed to go OK. I installed SP1 with both nodes active. The install went successful on the active node (Node A), but SP1 was not installed on the inactive node (Node ...
|
| Pros and Cons | 30 Oct 2006 16:28 GMT | 8 |
I'm writing a proposal for a DR solution for a SQL based application. I've been looking at clustering, database mirroring, etc. Has anyone come across any documentation discussing the pro's and cons of the various options available?
|
| 300MB DB uses 1.4GB RAM!? | 30 Oct 2006 10:19 GMT | 9 |
SQL Server 2000 running nothing but a 300MB database over the course of a month of continuous use from a single application winds up grabbing 1.4GB of RAM. Is that normal or excessive? (No performance degradation at all, jut a lot of RAM allocated.)
|
| SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition and Compliant Mode 80 | 27 Oct 2006 02:14 GMT | 1 |
If you run SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition in compliant mode 80, can you still utilize log shipping, database mirroring, or clustering? If it is possible, are there any problems related to the setup or administration?
|
| Great Plains 8.0/Dynamics 9 in a Clustered Environment | 26 Oct 2006 05:44 GMT | 4 |
I am pretty sure the answer is Yes, but I need to cover my bases on this. I know the SQL is covered, but are the applications above capable of functioning, i.e. cluster aware, in a clustered environment? If so, does anyone have any instructions or pointers to set me off into the ...
|
| SQL 2005 cluster | 25 Oct 2006 22:07 GMT | 3 |
Overview: We are planning a 2 node cluster. The Active node will be 8 GB RAM with one instance of SQL 2005 and 150 GB of SAN disk. This is considered the production node with failover to the second node (Passive).
|
| Migration to MySQL? | 25 Oct 2006 13:48 GMT | 3 |
From a "price point of view" migrating from the actual platform (2 node cluster Windows server 2003 with SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition)to MySQL can be very attractive. In fact our management starts to think that way...
|
| Restoring Master Database | 20 Oct 2006 16:45 GMT | 1 |
How can I restore master (SQL Server 2005) database on cluster environment? Thanks in Advance.
|
| CLUSTER Error: Could not find any IP address that this SQL Server instance depends upon | 18 Oct 2006 17:32 GMT | 2 |
I've got a sql 2005 active/passive cluster on win2k3 servers. In cluster admin under sql server 2005 group resources i've got: 3 physical disks IP Address - ip address of mycluster server
|
| copy database wizard in cluster sql 2005 | 17 Oct 2006 17:01 GMT | 1 |
I have a issue when i tried to copy database from a machine with MSDE database to a new sql 2005 cluster server. I could not copy it with copy database wizard. Here is the message i got. TITLE: Copy Database Wizard
|
| Problems with Virtual Test Environment setup | 17 Oct 2006 16:04 GMT | 2 |
Has anyone successfully created a test setup with Virtual Server 2005 RC2 using two shared resources: Quorum and Shared Disk Array. I have followed the "Using MicroSoft Virtual Server 2005 to Create and Configure a Two-Node Microsoft Window Server 2003 Cluster" document and ...
|
| Majority Node Set cluster | 17 Oct 2006 15:29 GMT | 2 |
If you want to deploy a SQL 2005 geocluster or a cluster without shared storage for quorum - there is only Windows 2003 Ent Edition "Majority Node Set" option. Majority Node Set implies three nodes for failover - in case one node is
|