Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / Other Technologies / Clustering / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
SAN settings for 3 SQL06 Oct 2006 21:16 GMT6
I am going to setup 3 set of SQL Server clustering, the 3 servers will be
direct attached via 4Gb FC cables to SAN storage (15X 73GB disks, FC 15K RPM).
Each server has the following configuration:
OS: Win2003 Enterprise
2-node cluster (Active/Passive) but with a catch!06 Oct 2006 20:29 GMT1
We have 2 blade servers and we need a clustering solution which will run
win2k3 and SQL 2005 in an Active/Passive mode. The catch is that our SAN will
not be in for another 5 weeks. The business needs to go live so I am trying
to find out what is the best way to handle this. I am ...
SP1 install question06 Oct 2006 16:41 GMT4
So per MS "Run the SP1 executable package file from the node (active node)
that owns the group containing the virtual server that you plan to upgrade."  
What does this mean?  We have an active passive cluster with the following
names;
SQL 2000 virtual servers can't see logs drive06 Oct 2006 12:27 GMT2
I have two SQL 2000 Virtual Servers running on a windows 2003 cluster. They
each have a data and a logs drive configured (located on a shared SAN).
The Windows virtual servers can see both drives just fine. But in SQL when I
try to changle the location of the Logs directory I am ...
Active - Active clustering -Second instance06 Oct 2006 02:11 GMT3
Trying to install a second named instance of SQL Server 2005 on a
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise two node cluster.  I am installing on the
node which the cluster group is currently on.  The first named instance I
installed went in like a champ - I have a Cluster Resource group, a ...
Installing a local instance of SQL on a Cluster Node05 Oct 2006 19:07 GMT4
I have an Active/Passive SQL 2000 Cluster - the OS is W3K Server.
I would like to install a local copy of SQL Server on the node that is
currently passive - if I start the SQL install process, it does give me
this option but I don't know what, if any, problems this might cause.
Cluster manager hangs05 Oct 2006 06:54 GMT2
We have two sql cluster nodes that works fine till lastweek. i can still move
the cluster goup manualy from the one node to the other. the problem is i
can't move the sqlgroup manualy to the other node. When i do that the sql
manager hangs and nothing happends till i reboot the ...
Suitable Hardware02 Oct 2006 05:18 GMT2
I have a database containing 1GB data. I have tuned all of queries and
indexes and they perform good comparing with the current hardware. But still
we lack performance! My boss has admitted that the server's hardware must be
upgraded but its my task to choose and offer the ...
SQL 2000 versus 2005 for High Availability01 Oct 2006 20:13 GMT5
Maybe Friday isn't the best time to ask, but here goes...
To improve our single instance sql2000 to High Availability standards, I'm
looking into clustering, log shipping, etc.  
We are totally sql2k now, so we would tend to stay there.   Are there any HA
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.