| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| SQL 2005 32 bit to 64 bit Migration | 18 May 2007 18:02 GMT | 2 |
We have a 2 node Active/Passive 32 bit SQL cluster. We wish to convert the cluster to 64 bit Server 2003 and 64 bit SQL 2005. It is of cheif importance that we don't have an exended outage as we are an ASP and our clients don't take well to this type of thing. If anyone can ...
|
| SQL 2005 64 bit | 18 May 2007 17:45 GMT | 1 |
We are planning to migrate from SQL 2000 32 to sq 2005 64 bit environment. Are there any known issues?
|
| Windows 2000 SQL cluster | 18 May 2007 10:31 GMT | 1 |
I am a new guy in Windows 2000 in SQL clustering. The SQL cluster cannot failover while 1 node is down. I would like to know if there is any standard checkup procedure or tools to collect information for further problme analysis.
|
| Clustering a standalone SQL server + storage array | 17 May 2007 23:31 GMT | 3 |
Hi all, i'm wondering whether any of you clustering experts could help. Our apps team look after a trading system that uses an HP DL360 server running SQL 2000 SP3a with a few small databases on it. This is a critical server as it stores trading system information, market orders ...
|
| Applying SP on SQL Cluster (active/passive) after new nodes Added | 17 May 2007 16:04 GMT | 5 |
Ran into a problem in scheduling applying the Service Pack to our SQL 2000 active/passive cluster when we add new nodes. 50 plus databases and an unknown number of apps. I'm wondering what people do to ensure that no apps/people are trying to
|
| SQL Server Agent Jobs | 16 May 2007 23:42 GMT | 2 |
Hello, theres I have a question about sql server agent jobs on clustered environment.(active/passive) After using SSMS to connect the cluster db, set up a new job on sql
|
| AWE on Clustering | 16 May 2007 23:40 GMT | 4 |
Thank you for Geoff N. Hiten provides me very useful info. Please experts confirm with the following. Please take alook at the follwing list and tell me whether it looks good to you.
|
| SQL DB without any stored procedures?! | 16 May 2007 19:49 GMT | 4 |
Does any one have any experience with the Hibernate layer [which acts as an abstraction layer between DB & application layers]? The factor which is bothering me is the absence of stored procedures. All transactions are done via this Hibernate Layer. What I am looking at is a ...
|
| Moving SQL2005 fail-over cluster between domain | 16 May 2007 14:49 GMT | 2 |
I'm looking for documentation about moving a fail-over cluster of SQL2005 between different IP network and between difefrent Windows domain. Some advice ? Thanks in advance.
|
| sp_configure (RECONFIGURE) | 16 May 2007 13:33 GMT | 1 |
When I run (copied from BOL as an example of enabling AWE) the following statement I got an error.It did changes but with error message. Should I use WITH OVERRIDE? Can someone explain on subject? Is it BOL incorrect?
|
| startup options | 16 May 2007 05:06 GMT | 5 |
Is there a way to readd the startup options for a server after removing them? The server will not connect without them and without being able to connect the properties sheet does not come up.
|
| SQL2k5 2-node clustering with one AMD and one Intel 64 bit machine | 14 May 2007 09:32 GMT | 4 |
Hi we have two 64 bit servers. One is AMD and another is Intel Xeon. We are thinking of building a SQL 2k5 cluster on them. The question is, is it OK to build a cluster as they are not the same architecture? They will both be running windows 2003 R2 64 Bit and SQL 2k5 64 bit.
|
| Migrating shared disk drives | 10 May 2007 05:52 GMT | 6 |
Our current setup is: 2 Windows 2003 Advanced Server, members of 2003 AD domain SQL cluster: active/passive shared drives: 4 logical drives: quorum, logs, database, IIS (old SAN)
|
| Domain groups in SQL Clustering... | 09 May 2007 02:05 GMT | 1 |
My customer is currently setting up a two node cluster. Since they are planning to use the same domain account to start all services, they are wondering if it’s OK to use only one domain group during setup. If they are using just one service account, are there any specific ...
|
| Analysis Service Ports | 08 May 2007 22:09 GMT | 2 |
SQL 2005 AS installed on a Cluster. We are using a named instance and only one currently exists. MS White paper reads: The default instance listens on port 2383, while named instances are dynamically allocated. This behavior can be changed by explicitly assigning a
|