| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| SQL Server service and SQL Agent Service account in a cluster | 29 Jul 2009 13:29 GMT | 1 |
I have a windows 2008 cluster configured and also have the SQL server and the SQL server agent service configured inside the cluster. In the services tab I have made these services manual and are configured under a dedicated domain service account.
|
| Can't get new LUN/Logical Drive visible from within SQL Server on cluster. | 27 Jul 2009 21:22 GMT | 10 |
We have had a working SQL Server 2000 SP3 (default instance) on two node MS Windows 2000 Advanced Server with MS Cluster servcie working for over a year now. The shared Q: and E: drives are actually two seperate LUNS from a SAN
|
| More SQL Clustering Fun | 24 Jul 2009 13:35 GMT | 4 |
The installation is progressing, however, it's failing in new and exciting ways. I'm encountering two different errors in my System Event Log: Cluster resource 'SQL Network Name (XXXXXXX)' in clustered service or
|
| SQL2K8/W2K8 and physical disk resources | 22 Jul 2009 07:10 GMT | 1 |
I wonder if my interpretation of the "offline" status given (in diskmgmt.msc) to a drive just added to a W2K8-based SQL cluster is correct. Let's say I allocate a brand spankin' new drive on my SAN and present it simultaneously to the nodes. I note right away that it's in ...
|
| SQL 2008 Clustering Error | 21 Jul 2009 15:00 GMT | 3 |
I'm trying to setup a SQL 2008 Cluster on a Windows 2008 Failover Cluster. I'm going through the SQL Server Failover Cluster instance setup wizard. I make it to the Instance Configuration screen. I've entered SQL2K8_Cluster into the SQL Server Network Name field. I've
|
| New Clustered Drives | 20 Jul 2009 22:24 GMT | 2 |
I wonder if my interpretation of the "offline" status given (in diskmgmt.msc) to a drive just added to a W2K8-based SQL cluster is correct. Let's say I allocate a brand spankin' new drive on my SAN and present it simultaneously to the nodes. I note right away that it's in ...
|
| SQL 2008 Installation | 16 Jul 2009 21:52 GMT | 14 |
Hello Everyone, I'm trying to setup a 2 node SQL 2008 failover cluster in windows 2008 (2 instances). After reading some documentation, I'm confused about the right path to follow.
|
| SQL problem | 13 Jul 2009 07:53 GMT | 2 |
I got the following error below while trying to take my database ofline Error occurred while attempting to drop worktable with partition ID 171518519279616 and Unable to drop worktable with partition ID 173615678750720 after repeated
|
| MSDTC with two instances in SQL 2008 / WIN 2008 | 08 Jul 2009 14:04 GMT | 1 |
I am having two instance in a SQL 2008 / Win 2008. In this case do I have to have two MSDTC resource groups in the cluster? Thanks, Gunter
|
| SQL 2008 standard or enterprise edition | 08 Jul 2009 07:52 GMT | 1 |
My company will buy 2 servers + 1cluster for storage SQL. I need buy SQL 2008 standard or enterprise edition suitable for cluster? Thanks!
|
| Instance names among clusters -- how unique? | 07 Jul 2009 17:18 GMT | 1 |
I'm kind of planning to transfer databases from server1\instance1 (on cluster-a) to server2\intance1 (on cluster-b) by detaching them from server1\instance1 and copying to server2\instance2? Or maybe backing them up to server2\instance from server1\instance1.
|
| Witness server | 02 Jul 2009 19:46 GMT | 5 |
I am trying to setup a SQL 2005 SP2 mirroring with auto failover. I need a witness server for such configuration. Is the witness server a didicated server for the mirorring set or I can use another stand alone SQL 2005 SP2 production server as a witness server (shared as a ...
|