| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Very large dimensions | 27 May 2007 21:53 GMT | 2 |
Looking at examples in Adventure Works and the Kimball equivalent client dimensions are at an individual account level. How realistic is this for very large account dimensions on order of 30 - 50 million accounts? Obviously this was not feasible in the 2000 AS version. Thanks.
|
| can ommiting log file speed up me and how | 22 May 2007 03:46 GMT | 2 |
Dear friends, I have a database with simple stucture and tasks but big data sizes (23M rec, 35G data file). Most of my data are static and I dn't need transaction facilities. so I set
|
| Materialized view or table function in SQL 2005 | 22 May 2007 03:36 GMT | 4 |
Please advise whether SQL 2005 has the smiliar function as belows: Materialized View in Oracle Materialized Query Tables in DB2 Thank you.
|
| Cube Model | 17 May 2007 17:09 GMT | 1 |
After generating a Cube Model (model from an OLAP source) from either Reporting Services or SSMS - is there any way to modify the model and re-deploy? It appears there is not - as there are ways for OLTP data sources.
|
| Warehouse Server Requirements | 16 May 2007 18:10 GMT | 5 |
We're considering creating a data warehouse with either SQL Server 2000 (which we have now) or SQL Server 2005 (which we hope to go to at some point in the future). Currently, we have a MSSQL 2k server running with around 20 - 30 separate databases.
|
| Report Model against Cube data source | 16 May 2007 02:51 GMT | 1 |
We have successfully generated a Report Model against a Cube data source. My question is I can't seem to figure out how to modify the model. The wizard organized and named entities in an odd way - and even finding the measures is in some obscure place. I know how to create ...
|
| Is there sth like Direct-Path-Loads in SQL-Server | 14 May 2007 11:22 GMT | 5 |
I'm familiar with direct-path-loads and SQL*Loader on Oracle. Does anyone know if sth like this is available on SQL-Server?
|
| Hot-Swappable dimensions | 03 May 2007 08:26 GMT | 1 |
We are in the middle of creating a dataware house. In the current model we have several hot-swappable (sub)dimensions which is linked to a large dimension table. All dimensions are type 2. I don't think that this is correct because when the data in the sub-dimension is changing
|