Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
DB Engine
SQL ServerMSDESQL Server CE
Services
Analysis (Data Mining)Analysis (OLAP)DTSIntegration ServicesNotification ServicesReporting Services
Programming
CLRConnectivitySQLXML
Other Technologies
ClusteringEnglish QueryFull-Text SearchReplicationService Broker
General
Data WarehousingPerformanceSecuritySetupSQL Server ToolsOther SQL Server Topics
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
MS AccessOther DB ProductsMS Server Products.NET DevelopmentVB DevelopmentJava DevelopmentMore Topics ...

SQL Server Forum / General / Performance / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Forced Parameterization30 Jan 2007 22:49 GMT2
I have a database that we are performing many reads againsts, but only a few
writes (actually, there is a bulk insert of about 22,000 records every
monday and that's about the only time we really ever write anything to it).
I have indexes on the large tables (those with more than ...
Does adding index on a table hamper INSERT and UPDATES?21 Jan 2007 17:48 GMT4
The table contains 200+ columns.  I have already some 15 non-clustered
indexes on it.  Does adding one (or few) more indexes affect INSERT and
UPDATES on the table?
TIA
select count(*) performance.... (SQL 2005)21 Jan 2007 06:03 GMT4
I have some SSIS packages where I count the  number of rows before and after
a loading.
So I execute a command:
select count(*) as RowsBefore from mytable
disk configuration to support best concurrency and performance21 Jan 2007 03:52 GMT15
I dealt with the same question for many years and decided to ask community
and hopefully MS gurus on what is the best disk configuration to support
multiple concurent update accesses.
Question is not that trivial as it may seem. Let say I need to run
Poor Execution Plan in SQL Server 200520 Jan 2007 17:16 GMT36
We have a database in SQL Server 2000. I made a copy of this
database(mdf,ndf,ldf) and attached it to SQL Server 2005 on the same
machine. When I try one particular SP in both of them, SQL Server 2000
performs almost 2.5 times faster than 2005. The execution plan in 2005
How I can speed up the DB?19 Jan 2007 21:09 GMT1
Hi All. I have two DB servers with the same Data one is SQL 2000 and the
other one is a SQL 2005 upgrade from 2000. We ran a Web app against both DB
(Same query). The 2000 Server for some reason returns the values twice faster
than 2005.
data type and performance10 Jan 2007 22:10 GMT6
hi,
I have a query about designing a database. I have column which can take only
two values (1/0) (ideal data type would be bit) but someone suggested me to
keep it as int as the processor upgrades any data type to int while
speed of inserting to clustered/unclustered10 Jan 2007 13:20 GMT11
Importing a text file via DTS into a newly truncated table with a
simple PK on an INT (not identity) column.
Watching the profiler, first it does the select for the datapump, then
it does a bulk insert.  There are a few light transforms in-between.
Horizontal Partitioning of OLTP Data in a normalized environment09 Jan 2007 17:34 GMT8
Gentlemen,
I am trying to determine how I would accomplish the following.  I have A DB
that is currently in production use that contains OLTP data.  Each of the
major logical structures has a base table (ie PART) that has an identity for
Database schema design08 Jan 2007 16:34 GMT7
First of all, please excuse me for the long post. The post is long but
hopefully the problem described is fairly simple for somewhat experienced
data modellers.
I am a beginner in database design so I was hoping that maybe you can give
Can Mix COUNT() with TOP?07 Jan 2007 03:16 GMT2
Can SQL do it as :
Select count(Top 2 *) from table1
I only want to return 0, 1, or 2 only.
USING MORE MEMORY05 Jan 2007 18:37 GMT3
i have 2 GB RAM in my sql server 2000.it is installed on windows 2003
enterprize edition. I have made 20 databases in the database.some databases
size is more than 6 gb.
my sql server is using RAM more than 1.8 GB.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.