| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Parameter Sniffing - Local Variables - OPTION (RECOMPILE) | 22 Apr 2007 17:02 GMT | 10 |
I need clarification about the exact effect of OPTION (RECOMPILE) at the end of query inside SP: 1) Does it help "Parameter Sniffing" happen even if we have used local variables in query?
|
| Profiler and Procedure Cache Resue (SP:CacheMiss) | 15 Apr 2007 08:59 GMT | 10 |
I have created this simple SP in SQL Server 2005: ------------------------------------ use northwind go
|
| IOs take longer | 13 Apr 2007 20:40 GMT | 2 |
We are on Win 2003 and SQL 2k, SP4 standard edition. We have been seeing such requests in our errorlog. "2007-04-09 11:36:28.29 spid62 SQL Server has encountered 148 occurrence(s) of IO requests taking longer than 15 seconds to complete on
|
| 4GB RAM and no awe enabled | 12 Apr 2007 19:27 GMT | 3 |
I have a win2003 system (4 GB and 4 CPUs) with sql 2k standard edition running on it. I believe AWE cannot be enabled on a standard edition. a) Is that true ? b) SQL server is the only one running on that windows server (no other
|
| Index useage | 09 Apr 2007 17:40 GMT | 6 |
I'd like to get some pointers on how I might expect SQLServer to use my indexes. For example if on a table I have IndexA on Field1 and a compound index IndexB on Field1, Field2 can I expect SQL to perform just as well for searches on Field1 if I eliminate IndexA?
|
| sql server x64 bit performance problems -- errors in log | 07 Apr 2007 09:26 GMT | 2 |
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. My environment as follows:. Win 2003 R2 SQL 2005 x64 EE 12 GB RAM, AWE Enabled
|
| stuffed optimiser on a ONE table query - how to circumvent? | 01 Apr 2007 20:07 GMT | 3 |
Damn I really want to be able to post a JPG of the query execution plan. Suffice to say the query with the index hint is vastly superior. Have included the text showplan at the bottom, it may not wrap very well! The table has a primary clustered key on ID; 4 million records, ...
|