| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| containstable, top_n_rank, and additional where clause combination causes unexpected result | 30 Oct 2004 15:14 GMT | 6 |
Something strange happens if I try and do the following: If I use the containstable function, with top_n_rank, along with an extra "and where" clause, then the top_n_rank does not seem to return the correct number of rows.
|
| get text near key words | 29 Oct 2004 07:54 GMT | 4 |
When i query key words , i can get the docname,doctype etc. Can i get some texts near the searching words ? like the result fo google !
|
| Checking for existence of a table that is already full-text indexe | 28 Oct 2004 17:33 GMT | 2 |
Full-text indexing was manually set up to work on the development server. Now, I need to write a SQL script to programmatically set up Full-text indexing on the staging server and then on the production server. The SQL script must be rerunnable. It should handle the scenario where
|
| CONTAINS performance | 28 Oct 2004 00:07 GMT | 14 |
Given the query: Select * from A left outer join B on A.bid=B.id
|
| Filter Html tags on Full text Search | 26 Oct 2004 22:10 GMT | 16 |
I have a Text field in my database that has data along with the HTML tags. I dont want to search these HTML tags on my FUll text Search. Example Data < Font color='red'> Blah</Font>
|
| SSL in won't work under Domain User account. MS Fix buletin does not help at all. Please Help!! | 26 Oct 2004 19:33 GMT | 3 |
I have set up an Active Directory, Certificate Services on Windows 2003 Server. I am running SQL 2000 Server. AD and Certificate Services were installed correctly. My goal is to be able to use SSL when connecting to SQL Server via Query
|
| After switch to "Change tracking", full-text index repopulate in f | 26 Oct 2004 19:28 GMT | 7 |
I have a table setup running full-text index in sql server 2000. After finishing 12 hrs long of initial full population, I immediately turned on the "change tracking, update index in background". The full text index population restart all over again even though there is no data ...
|
| Removing duplicate dat | 26 Oct 2004 14:47 GMT | 2 |
I have a 1.5 million row table with a text field. Can anybody think of a way to remove any duplicate rows where the text field contains the same data (and a way which will not take days to run!)
|
| Word breakers and "special" characters | 26 Oct 2004 13:56 GMT | 15 |
I've been digging around trying to find out how to allow my FTS implementation deal with punctuation and "special" characters in a way that fits my needs, but can't find a definite answer. I'm leaning towards trying to switch to the Neutral Word Breaker setting to see if it will ...
|
| Difficulty in implementing | 26 Oct 2004 01:42 GMT | 5 |
How difficult is it to implement the full text searching capability provided by SQL server if it wasn't implemented to start with? Currently I have an application that allows searching based on user profile fields. However it's not taking advantage of the full text indexing.
|
| Full Text Search Performance | 25 Oct 2004 18:06 GMT | 16 |
I have full text search enabled on two large tables, the first one has 3 million records (FT index column length is around 512-1025 char), and the other one has around 1.6 records (FT index column length is around 50-120 char)
|
| FT index not function ? | 25 Oct 2004 16:34 GMT | 7 |
I configure a table with FT index , but when i search the table , nothing returned , why ? Windows 2003 EE (Chinese Edition) SQL Server 2k + SP3 (Chinese Edition)
|
| Inconsistent Search Results | 22 Oct 2004 19:22 GMT | 4 |
When searching for this street using this parameter: 'L''Avenue De La Reine Elizabeth' I get a result ( The record contains 'L''Avenue De La Reine Elizabeth The Second',)
|
| Yukon Stability | 22 Oct 2004 18:49 GMT | 3 |
We're about to deploy a new application, based primarily on FTS. Because it is an isolated use, I'd like to take advantage of the FTS features in Yukon. Is Yukon stable enough to go into a limited production environment? I understand that there is at least one more
|
| FTS ON View in Yukon ? | 22 Oct 2004 18:39 GMT | 4 |
I am eargerly awaiting my MSDN Universal, until then I am very interested to know if Yukon will allow a View to be FT Indexed ? I am working on a scenario right as we speak that may be worth pushing off for the moment if SQL 2005 Will support these
|