| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Is this a security risk? | 29 Apr 2005 19:55 GMT | 2 |
I'm doing some testing on a vendor’s web site and ran into the error below. I told the vendor that displaying this kind of error could give a hacker the information needed to hack the db or attempt SQL injection attacks etc. (btw this is a bank). The vendor is telling me that ...
|
| Login failed for user 'sa' | 28 Apr 2005 17:36 GMT | 2 |
We are getting a lot of entries in the Windows event log indicating 'Login failed for user 'sa'' and 'root'. It seems like an obvious hack attempt but is there any way of determining the source (ip address) of these attempts. I can't understand why SQL doesn't log the ip address ...
|
| Multiple accounts with the name MSSQLSvc... | 28 Apr 2005 17:32 GMT | 2 |
Got a KDC Error with the following description: ========================================== Event Type: Error Event Source: KDC
|
| malicious process... | 28 Apr 2005 12:42 GMT | 1 |
Since I installed a firewall on my machine, it regularly detects unexpected ftp sessions. Thanks to a process explorer, I remarked that ftp is launched from a (hidden) cmd.exe, itself lauched by
|
| Add Database Role to Login Name | 28 Apr 2005 06:27 GMT | 1 |
I have a SQL Server 2000 database that I restore often. After the database is restored I need to add database security role to Login Name Chicago\CH-datareader-K. How would I add the database role 'db_datareader' to Login Name
|
| Inactive record | 27 Apr 2005 22:55 GMT | 4 |
Hi just wondering if there is a way to have one record in a table be read only, were an application can not remove it and have all other records act normally? I am currently handling this in .net code but would prefer to have it built into the table.
|
| SQL Server 2000 on Win 2003 and DTC | 27 Apr 2005 15:39 GMT | 4 |
We have an env. with a distributed COM+ application on a Win2003 server and a SQL Server 2000 on a Win 2003 server, connecting through ODBC. In this env. we always get "Failed to enlist Distributed
|
| 2003 AD network security policy question | 27 Apr 2005 08:14 GMT | 1 |
Dear Colleagues: With Windows NT networks (and I believe 2000 as well), I was unable to set up a stronger password policy for certain groups. My desired result is to put a stronger password policy on one group, but a
|
| MS03-31 for Sql 2000 SP3a and Windows 2003 SP1 | 27 Apr 2005 06:18 GMT | 2 |
Hello. I'm running Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition with SP1. After installing SP1 for OS I installed MS SQL Server 2000 and applied the SP3a. Then I checked my system with MBSA. MBSA reported that I have to apply the MS03-31 patch. I installed this patch but after this the ...
|
| Authentication Mode | 26 Apr 2005 16:34 GMT | 1 |
If I have a server with windows only authentication mode, How can I login in Sql Server 2000 using SA or GUEST account? It is possible?
|
| How Does SQL Server Verify Domain Security | 25 Apr 2005 16:12 GMT | 5 |
How does SQL Server verify the credentials of a domain user who attempts to use a database with domain security? Is some sort of Kerberos key passed instead of the userid and password, and how does SQL Server's security verify these tokens are correct?
|
| Profiler and user password | 25 Apr 2005 12:44 GMT | 2 |
Is it possible for profiler to show which password is used when a user logs to a sql server and the users ip ?? If so how.
|
| want addattachment automatically thought sql agent mail alert | 23 Apr 2005 10:56 GMT | 1 |
I want to add an attachement when my job fineshed and raise a alert mail.
 Signature waiting for solution from
|
| Login failed for user 'NT Authority\Anonymous | 22 Apr 2005 21:35 GMT | 1 |
I have a Merge Replication configuration in which one Publisher replicates with 20 subscribers. Currently, we use Windows Integrated security. I get the following error when attempting to access tables in a remote
|
| MS03-031 Patch problem | 21 Apr 2005 21:48 GMT | 2 |
Hello - I am having a problem installing the MS03-031 hotfix on SQL Server 2000. The installation package extracts the files and says that the installation was successful, but when the version # is checked - it is still 8.00.760 and not
|