| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| how to change security settings | 31 Jan 2009 17:25 GMT | 2 |
I cannot find the settings in SQL 2005 that allow me to change password security policies (such as how many days before a user has to chagne his/her pwd). But I did find this: http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid87_gci1102101,00.html
|
| Wish to learn SQL..pls help :) | 29 Jan 2009 16:52 GMT | 1 |
Wish to learn SQL..pls help :) hi all i am interested in learning SQL but i cant afford to buy any software since i am broke :( is
|
| domain groups in NT4 days | 29 Jan 2009 14:41 GMT | 1 |
Was there ever a period in SQL Server history, when you could not control security by putting NT logins into a domain group, and giving that group privileges in SQL Server? I keep hearing that around the office, that we have 900 user logins
|
| Service Account Rights (Detailed) 2000/2005/2008 | 29 Jan 2009 00:00 GMT | 4 |
Does anyone know where I can get a detailed list of what OS, Registry, NTFS and SQL related permissions I would need to assign to a domain account to use it for running the SQL Server and SQL Server Agent Services? The only article I have found is http://support.microsoft ...
|
| Issue in SQL version | 28 Jan 2009 23:31 GMT | 9 |
I am newbie and for getting version of server, fired SELECT @@version in my Sql 2005 express but i am getting Server-2000 and i expected it as 2005. Please clarify.
|
| BUILTIN\Administrators Account | 26 Jan 2009 16:55 GMT | 3 |
I have a query abou the BUILTIN\Administrators Account, I have recently had a problem with a System Administrator not knowing what they were up to and adding a new maintenance task to my sql server installation 2005 on Windows NT machine to make backups that were a. being done, b ...
|
| Snapshot security | 23 Jan 2009 12:49 GMT | 1 |
Hi, We have a primary server and another server that is the mirror of the primary server and a snapshot of the mirror on that same server. SS is droped and recreated everyday. Mirror also copies all the logins and security to use
|
| SQL Error 4060, SQL State 1 | 18 Jan 2009 21:36 GMT | 2 |
My client has a W2003 Server with Sql 2000 SP4 running. There is a security group defined on the W2003 Server that has all the logins that can access the application database. I installed SQL Express 2005 on a client computer which is a member of the
|
| "<MachineName>\ASPNET Account" and "NT Authority\Syst | 18 Jan 2009 21:34 GMT | 2 |
I am talking about .Net Framework 2.0 and .Net Framework 1.1 When accessing SQL Database through ADO.Net C#, in the connection string when we specify Windows Integrated Authentication. i.e. "INTEGRATED SECURITY = SSPI" , what exactly happens... Does the .Net Framework , access SQL ...
|
| KB954606 security update failed | 16 Jan 2009 12:51 GMT | 20 |
I have SQL server 2005 express verions install and get KB954606 security update failed since Sep/2008. What should I do for this? Does it mean that my computer has virus or contorled by someone to
|
| TCP 1433 and UDP 1434 | 16 Jan 2009 12:30 GMT | 6 |
I know that in SQL 2000 these ports needed to be disabled for none trusted connections. Do you need to do the dame for 2005 and 2008? Thanks Peter
|
| Installing SP 3 | 09 Jan 2009 23:07 GMT | 4 |
I am trying to install Sql Server 2005 SP3 on SQL Server 2005 developer edition SP2 running on windows 2003 SP2. I get an error i am pasting below: Unhandeled exception at 0x01090e9a in hotfix.exe: 0xC0000005: Access
|
| Getting the windows username (of the connection) | 09 Jan 2009 15:36 GMT | 8 |
In my company we are more than 10000 users. I want windows authentication but I do not want to create 10000 login accounts. My server and databases should allows all valid windows users (we use active directory). I only allow the public role (of every db) to execute certain stored ...
|
| minimum rights for activity monitor | 08 Jan 2009 16:08 GMT | 1 |
could someone please let me know, which are the minimum admin rights (security role(s)) needed to provide a sql user just the possibility to work with activity monitor?
|
| Microsoft Security Advisory (961040) | 06 Jan 2009 17:19 GMT | 1 |
We are running a mix of SQL 2000 SP4 and SQL 2005 SP2 servers and only utilize replication on one box. For this advisory we plan to update the one 2000 box per the Advisory's workaround directions, and update the SQL 2005 boxes to SP3. Our question is, do we really need to also ...
|