| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Locale on SQL 2K and Win 2003 | 29 Apr 2005 18:18 GMT | 1 |
I'm having a problem with queries updating 'dates'. Its a SQL 2K on Win 2003. The application is running querries using date in canadian format (ddmmyyyy) and SQL errors out and works fine if the date is in US format (mmddyyyy). I tried to change the language settings in the ...
|
| SQL SERVER INSTANCES | 29 Apr 2005 15:16 GMT | 1 |
Tipically when I create a new SQLSERVER 2000 instance I put a new port number or the same port number of my default istance? What's better method? Why? I'm a vb developer and I need to create a good connection
|
| SQL server 2000 Which version 64 bit / 32 bit | 29 Apr 2005 15:14 GMT | 1 |
I am planning to install SQL server on a new machine. The machine configuration is 2x Intel XEON 2.4 Ghz. Now the confusion is that which version of SQL server 2000 shall i go for? a 32 bit or a 64 bit version. Is that a multiprocessor means 2* 32 ( 64 bit) parocessor ? I am really
|
| Sqlserver eval won't install | 29 Apr 2005 06:20 GMT | 2 |
Downloaded sqlserver eval. When I click to install, it reads contents then stops and gives error message "not enough disk space - free up 439KB". I have 80 G of free space. Two G of memory. Tried on two different computers and got the same error message.
|
| setup of the Builtin\Administrator account | 28 Apr 2005 23:01 GMT | 1 |
I read an articale some time ago that stated that the BUILTIN\Adminisrator account should be modified so that the Admins of the Windows OS do not have SA rights to the Databases in SQL Server 2000. I can't rememner the steps
|
| Using SQL Server 2000 Merge Modules May Result in Confusing Messag | 28 Apr 2005 16:10 GMT | 1 |
I have some problem with using merge modules for MSDE 2000 in my application MSI setup. This problem described in article "Using SQL Server 2000 Merge Modules May Result in Confusing Message" (Article ID : 274224) in Microsoft knowledge base.
|
| Downgrade from SQL Standard to Workgroup. | 28 Apr 2005 15:21 GMT | 1 |
I will have some servers that might need to downgrade from Sql 2000 Standard to SQL 2000 Workgroup and want to be prepared for the questions. Assuming that the hardware and software are in spec, has anyone done this yet? Any KB's or other MSFT notes on the topic?
|
| Using Processor | 28 Apr 2005 12:54 GMT | 1 |
I've read from an article, that recomended to setting SQL Server Use processor number 1,2, and 3 (If the server use 4 processor). Processor number 0 should not be used due to avoid the logon problem. Does this information correct?
|
| can not start sql services after restoring master db from other se | 28 Apr 2005 01:50 GMT | 1 |
Basically, I have a master db backup from a prod server. The path of data and log files and errorlog are on different drive letters (C, F, G...). I only have drive C on my test machine. here is the error I got: Could not open error log file: 'C:\program files\microsoft sql
|
| FileGroup | 27 Apr 2005 21:39 GMT | 1 |
I have a medium size SQL database that I just moved to a new server... The database is about 60 gb and the server I had it on before had 75gb of space for data... I have recently moved it to a larger server (300+)gb expandable to 2.4tb...
|
| Best practices for raid configuration using SQL on SBS 2003 | 27 Apr 2005 21:08 GMT | 2 |
I am currently building a dell 2800 running sbs 2003, i have 6 x 72 gig drives, dual xeon processors 3 g ram etc.I am looking for some clarity/explanations as to benefits configuring raid 10 on this unit, it will be running sql, exchange and Isa with approx 20 users so
|
| Let SQL Server 2000 Ent. Use more than 4gb of RAM on Win2k AdvancedServer | 27 Apr 2005 12:35 GMT | 1 |
how must i configure SQL Server Enterprise Edition so it uses up to 8 GB ram on windows 2000 advanced server? We habe upgraded RAM from 4 GB to 8 GB but SQL Server still uses only 3
|
| data files location | 27 Apr 2005 12:32 GMT | 3 |
I have a server (w2k, sp4) on which I have installed SQL w2k, sp3a. It has two physical drives, C: (6gb) and D: (9gb). During the install, I wanted to place the data files on the second drive. (I know the executables and the system files go on the system drive.) I
|
| performance increases if uses processor based license? | 27 Apr 2005 11:20 GMT | 1 |
If we use processor based license for SQL Server will that improve performance compare to CAL based licensing? Thanks. Ram
|
| SQL 2005 Beta 2 + VS.Net 2005 Beta 2 | 27 Apr 2005 01:48 GMT | 4 |
I'm having troubles installing both SQL 2005 and VS.Net on the same box. I put VS.net on the box so i can easily modify source files from wherever i am if i need to. It seems that SQL2005 needs .Net 2.0 Beta and VS.Net needs .net 2.0 Beta 2 -
|