| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Cannot kill process with EC wait type | 18 Mar 2008 08:52 GMT | 3 |
I had tired to create index on large databse (>200GB, engine ss2k) but I got errors, so I executed DBCC CHECKDB. DBCC told me that I have to execute it with repair options. But I noticed in Activity Monitor that I had still running creating index process with EC wait type. Then I
|
| bcp - Transaction LogFile Size issue | 18 Mar 2008 08:12 GMT | 5 |
Hi Experts, I am having new issue again, My task is to copy data from one table to another table residing in different database.
|
| virtual environment licensing | 18 Mar 2008 07:26 GMT | 1 |
I understand that SQL Server 2005's licensing model is per socket, not per core, for physical and virtual installations. For virtualization, I understand you can have multiple SQL Server 2005 installs and the licenses are shared across the physical server. Licensing is still ...
|
| Any advantage to using named pipes in connecting to a SQL Server? | 18 Mar 2008 03:25 GMT | 1 |
Gurus, Is there any advantage to running an application to use named pipes in connecting to a SQL Server instead of TCP/IP? I would think no, b/c named pipes is a legacy, slower form of communication, correct?
|
| sp_updatestats now running longer and causing timeouts/blocks | 18 Mar 2008 02:38 GMT | 4 |
After more than 2.5 years of running the sp_updatestats on our production (OLTP) SQL 2005 SP2a CU3 server we have suddenly noticed an abrupt change in runtime behavior. Prior to 3/6/2008 this job was scheduled to run daily (6:30am). The job historically completed in 9 – 11 min. ...
|
| Point-in-time recovery using Log file backups newer than full back | 17 Mar 2008 23:01 GMT | 3 |
Hopefully I can ask this question w/o too much confusion. The example I am about to give may not be practical, but the answer should help me understand db and log backups a little better. Scenario:
|
| Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 87 17march | 17 Mar 2008 21:29 GMT | 1 |
Source computer: SQL server 2005 SP1 Remote computer : SQLEXPRESS When I try to register/connect with remote server (named instance) using sql server management studio I am getting following error:
|
| SQL 2005 - I am Missing an Installed Component Help!! | 17 Mar 2008 18:38 GMT | 2 |
Hey guys, This may sound like a dumb question, but I am remoted to a customer's server, and I need to run some SQL scripts. They do have SQL server 2005 installed.
|
| Do regular stored procedures still run when Agent XPs are disabled? | 17 Mar 2008 18:22 GMT | 1 |
Gurus, I noticed when my SQL Server Agent is stopped, what appears in SSMS is the following: "SQL Server Agent (Agent XPs disabled)"
|
| update or insert into question | 17 Mar 2008 17:37 GMT | 2 |
Using MSQL SMS: Table one: access db. Table two: remote sql db table. Using the import export wizard:
|
| Database Migration | 17 Mar 2008 15:19 GMT | 1 |
I need to migrate our databases from one server to another. Now since these databases have DTS packages/scheduled jobs associated with them, should i just restore the MSDB database on the target server to recover all settings? Or is there any alternate way that will be best for my ...
|
| Sql Server Performance Counter | 17 Mar 2008 15:02 GMT | 3 |
Cache hit ratio -> Counter in Category -> SqlServer-Catalog Metadata, shows 20-27 as average in our boxes. Is this fine? Whats the ideal or recommended range for this counter?
|
| how to make the database size smaller? | 17 Mar 2008 13:10 GMT | 4 |
my database is 9G! I try to truncate some table to make the database smaller but it seems it doesn't help, the database size has not changed by truncate some table, so is there any good method to make the database size smaller? (I accept some data loss in some table)!!
|
| Expanding database ?? | 17 Mar 2008 12:36 GMT | 1 |
After I reboot my server server 2003 with SQL it expands the room taken on the RAID array and then drops back after leaving only 10GB on 150GB hard drive space to ony 40GB leaving 110GB. Any ideas to why it does this after a reboot.
|
| Poor performance when using Transact SQL cursor | 17 Mar 2008 11:35 GMT | 5 |
After a recent upgrade from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005, we get problems with certain queries using a Transact SQL cursor. I have noticed the following: Table with a smaller number of rows.
|