| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| SQL Mirroring Question | 11 Sep 2008 15:48 GMT | 1 |
We have 2 x SQL Server 2005 and database mirroring is enabled and working. Server A = Principal Server B = Mirror
|
| Value in putting system DB logs on different drives? | 11 Sep 2008 14:54 GMT | 2 |
I was wondering if it was worth it to put the system log (ldf) files on a different physical drive than the data files. I was going to move the master, model, msdb and tempdb log files to a different drive.
|
| Local drives not all showing up SQL backup | 11 Sep 2008 14:34 GMT | 4 |
SQL Server 2005 Enterpise SP2 Windows 2003 Server Enterprise SP2 Snapdrive software maps LUNs from Netapp This server has 5 drives that show up local to the server. They are SAN
|
| SP3 to SQL 2005 ?. | 11 Sep 2008 13:53 GMT | 1 |
Will there be a SP3 to SQL2005, now that SQL2008 is in RTM. We got a lot of SP2 SQL2005 server, and dont know if we shall wait for SP3 if it come... or to upgrade with UP9 patch to SQL2005
|
| Split TempDB into Multiple files possibly a bad thing? | 11 Sep 2008 13:02 GMT | 6 |
I recently put in a change to tempdb splitting it into 8 data files, one per each processor over our SAN as well as putting in the -T1118 startup parameter for page allocation within TempDB on our main datawarehouse server. Since then all runs well except 1 job. This
|
| Reg. SQL server 2000 CAL License Donwngrade | 11 Sep 2008 11:37 GMT | 2 |
we have SQL server 2000 and had more than 100 Device CAL's (SQL 2000 CALS and SQL 2003 CAL's). We want to add few more lincense and vendor says the current SQL CAL availble is SQL Server CAL 2008 and can not be used with SQL server 2000.
|
| Compress Drive SQL database | 11 Sep 2008 07:21 GMT | 6 |
Someone has set the compress drive flag on a SQL 2005 Windows 2003 disk drive. Our vendor thinks this may be the reason users are experiencing performance issues with the application. What can we expect if we remove the flag?
|
| SQLServer build numbers - lookup | 11 Sep 2008 04:57 GMT | 2 |
This URL which lists the SQLServer build numbers is incomplete. Does anyone know a more up-to-date one? http://blogs.msdn.com/blogfiles/ukdynsupport/WindowsLiveWriter/Allyouneedtoknowa boutSQLServerbuildnumbe_EE82/image_2.png TIA,
|
| SSMS screen refresh rate very slow | 11 Sep 2008 03:28 GMT | 1 |
I got a new computer at work. I installed client tools on it. When ever I open a table in SSMS, my scroll/screen refresh rate in SSMS is very slow...almost painfully slow. On my old computer it is very fast...almost instantaneous.
|
| SQL Server 2000 to 2008 | 11 Sep 2008 03:23 GMT | 1 |
We are in the process of purchasing SQL Server 2008 in order to upgrade installations of SQL Server 2000. One of our applications uses a number of stored procedures to operate. What kind of issues are involved in doing such a conversion? We had
|
| Strange Data Truncation problem | 11 Sep 2008 02:51 GMT | 3 |
We are seeing an 8152 truncation message on one server that is not showing on another server. This message should be showing up as we are trying to squeeze 9 characters into a 7 character column. As this showed up in Acceptance testing when it works in Development I was wondering ...
|
| LiteSpeed Error | 10 Sep 2008 19:59 GMT | 2 |
Has anyone come across this error when trying to restore a litespeed backup? SLS Error: XML returned from Engine was invalid. : Error Msg: (0): '2008-08-31 21:00:12' restore failed for "dbname". I'm on ls version 4.8.4.00086 and the backups where done in 4.6.0.00293 (my
|
| update with subquery | 10 Sep 2008 17:42 GMT | 1 |
update TABLE set COLUMN_A = 0 FROM TABLE where EXISTS (select TOP 1 * from TABLE where ID = 1 order by row desc) My TABLE includes the following data: ROW ID COLUMN_A
|
| Thoughts on MS08-052 SQL2005 | 10 Sep 2008 17:40 GMT | 2 |
MS08-052 has an SQL2005 component that is fixed in CU9 (build 3282). I have not seen very much about the SQL part of this security bulletin but it looks like it is Reporting Services that is affected. We have Reporting Services installed and are running it under a low
|
| multiple databases on one instance sql 2000 | 10 Sep 2008 16:01 GMT | 4 |
I found there is a sql 2000 server with OS 2000 has multiple databases with identical structure in one instance. Each database is used by one client. Is this good idea? They are sharing one tempdb and tempdb is used very heavily. I was told this server is 2 Cpus quad core, does ...
|