| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Many to Many Tables | 23 Sep 2008 15:23 GMT | 4 |
All, We have a senario where we are joining 3 tables for a query that could have a many to many relationships, between 2 of the tables. I want to know what is the best way to go about it? also what would be the best way to go about
|
| puzzled by sp_ behaviour | 23 Sep 2008 14:36 GMT | 2 |
I'm running into a strange (version / environment dependent) problem with SQL Server 2005. When executing a selection against the system views (like information_schema.tables or sys.indexes) in a sp_ procedure (created in master) connected against a user database, some platform / ...
|
| Constraint using UDF always violates | 23 Sep 2008 08:12 GMT | 2 |
I'm trying to write a check constraint that uses a UDF to validate whenever an INSERT or UPDATE occures. I can write the UDF and configure the constraint, however when I do an insert I always get an "INSERT statement conflicted with the CHECK constraint" error, even though if I ...
|
| Auditss in SQL server 2008 | 23 Sep 2008 05:32 GMT | 1 |
I am new to SQL server 2008. A standard edition of SQL server 2008 has been installed on windows server 2003. While trying to setup audits, the sql server shows "Auditing is not available in this edition of sql serer. (Micosoft SQL serve,r error:33075)"
|
| search on the table | 23 Sep 2008 01:47 GMT | 1 |
We have a job inserting data into table1 every night, then during the day, we need to run a sp to do a search on table1. This database is set auto update statitics and auto create statitics, anything else I need to do with the searching process regarding the performance respect.
|
| Table copy/import/move/replication | 23 Sep 2008 01:42 GMT | 3 |
Hi SQL server 2000 SP4 on both servers. We have two applications on two separate servers with separate sql databases on each server. One application needs to select data from another application
|
| Views and Indexes | 22 Sep 2008 21:03 GMT | 2 |
I would like to use views more in the architecture of application. I am told by my manager that in some situation they don't use indexes properly. My manager's away so I can't ask him. Can anyone shed any light on what he means?
|
| SQL Server 2008 Devleoper Edition | 22 Sep 2008 17:23 GMT | 5 |
Is there a Developer Edition for 2008 similar to the DE that was made available for 2005? If not is there an equivalent?
|
| multiple databases on single server vs single db on single server | 22 Sep 2008 17:07 GMT | 5 |
I have a silly question to ask. If there is a single server running sql 2000, then only one database db1 residing on it, compare to multiple databases residing on single server, the performance is much better, right? If this is the case, is there a way to improve it on the ...
|
| Users Jobs Failing | 22 Sep 2008 16:09 GMT | 2 |
We have a server running SQL Server 2005. There is a job that one of our DBA's has set up that fails when manually run. This job is set as himself as the owner (domain user). When the job runs it fails and gives the following error:
|
| SQL server backup device | 22 Sep 2008 15:49 GMT | 4 |
Lately, I purchased an entry level server HP ML110G5 bundled with internal HP DAT72 USB internal tape device running SQL server. Under SQL server management, backup, new backup device, the tape device always greyed out and unable to backup my DB to tape.
|
| SQL2000 SP4 on Win2003 SP2 x64 with 32GB | 22 Sep 2008 14:04 GMT | 1 |
I'm starting to get really confused at the moment...Last week we did an installation of Windows 2003 SP2 x64 Enterprise with SQL2000 SP4. We installed everything succesfull and applied the /PAE in the boot.ini and enabled the AWE function. Then we allocated 26GB min and 28GB max ...
|
| Help to mail the result in sql 2005 | 22 Sep 2008 13:54 GMT | 4 |
Bellow are may script. Now I want tho have the result mail to my. The mail setup are ok to mail a test mail and my mail profile is named "SQL Mail"
|
| Soft Deletes | 22 Sep 2008 12:52 GMT | 12 |
This is entirely SQL related... but has to do with some SQL things we're doing in a project. The sponsor says we can't delete data. So, soft deletes all the way. Now, I'd like to know the right way to handle this: We have a
|
| Recycling Identity Key Values | 22 Sep 2008 10:42 GMT | 3 |
I was told its possible for SQL Server 2005 table identity values to be re-used (if they have been deleted) when inserting new rows, rather than always incrementing the previous maximum value. Is this correct and, if so, how is it turned on?
|